Ammo Spotlight: 6.5 Creedmoor

This drawing of the Creedmoor Range depicting the venue and the crowd attending a day of competitive shooting between American and British riflemen appeared in the 6 October 1877 edition of The Illustrated London News. In those days, society did not frown upon firearm activities.

By Pierre van der Walt

Cartridge History

American popularity makes or breaks cartridges and calibres. I have always been amazed at the apparent ignorance of Americans about the world of cartridges beyond the .30-30 Winchester, the .30-06 Springfield, .308 Winchester and the .223 Remington. A typical example is 6,5mm cartridges. Americans overlooked the potential of this calibre and its cartridges for 113 years before the penny finally dropped for them. Although cartridges such as the .264 Winchester Magnum and the 6.5 Remington Magnum had been around since 1959 and 1966 respectively, the 6,5mm calibre just did not gain any US traction.

 

Fortunately, the Americans eventually discovered the existence of some calibres and cartridges beyond the walls of Springfield, Remington and Winchester. This is an excellent development, because for all other American shortcomings, American buying power has been the decisive factor in the survival of the firearm and cartridge industries.

 

The 6.5 Creedmoor is an example. It emanated from a discussion between Hornady’s Dave Emary and High-Power National Champion, Dennis DeMille on the problems experienced by 6mm wildcat users at the 2007 Camp Perry National Matches. They concluded that a modern, SAAMI regulated commercially produced cartridge that was capable of winning National Matches was needed. The 6mm calibre could obviously not achieve that. Emary and his engineering colleague, Joe Thielen, opted to step up from the 6mm to the 6,5mm calibre with its higher ballistic coefficient potential. Their goal was to create a short-action cartridge capable of supersonic velocity out to 1,200 yards while adding the minimum recoil, and they succeeded.

 

The Creedmoor name is steeped in long-range tradition. Let us step back in history to the post American Civil War era. The statistics indicated that Union Army soldiers only hit one Confederate soldier out of every thousand shots fired during the war. This was a great concern and it was decided to establish an organisation dedicated to the improvement of American marksmanship. The organisation, dubbed the National Rifle Association of America (NRA), was established in New York on 16 November 1871. During 1872, the fledgling body succeeded in convincing the New York Legislature to contribute US$ 25,000 to purchase 70 acres (28,3 ha) of farmland from a Mr Creed, for development as a long-distance

Technical Specs

First Regulator SAAMI
Introduced  2007
Country USA
Relative Case Capacity 53.5 gr water (3,474 cc)
Case Trim Length  1.912” (48,57 mm)
Expansion Ratio  7.8
Groove Diameter .2640” (6,71 mm)
Bore Diameter .2560 (6,50 mm)
Groove Details 6 x .0900” (2,29 mm)
CAB-Ratio 71.8
Minimum Barrel Area  0.0536”² (34,58 mm²)
Std Proof Barrel Twist 1:8.0” (1:203 mm)
Max Average Pressure 62,000 psi (427Mpa)
RCBS Shellholder 3

 

Creedmoor 6.5 bullet

rifle range. When a Colonel Shaw, one of the NRA range committee members first saw the piece of land, he said that it reminded him of a moor. So, it became known as Creed’s Moor and later, simply Creedmoor.

 

The Creedmoor range was officially opened on 21 June 1873 and soon hosted historic competitions such as the famous one between the NRA and the Irish Rifle Team (which included the eminent John Rigby) in September 1874.

 It is therefore rather fitting that Emary and Thielen’s dedicated long-range match cartridge, the first commercial rifle cartridge ever specifically conceived and designed for extreme range competition, was dubbed the 6.5 Creedmoor.

 

It took a while before the 6.5 Creedmoor captured the imagination of the American shooting fraternity, but when the 6,5mm penny finally dropped, it did so big time. Today the 6.5 Creedmoor is the best-selling long-range, match cartridge on the planet.

Characteristics

The 6.5 Creedmoor is an indirect sibling of the .308 Winchester. In 1982 Winchester introduced the .307 Winchester cartridge as a rimmed version of its .308 for the Winchester M-94 Big Bore lever action. The concept did not catch on, but around 2007 the Thomson Center company requested Hornady to create a .30 calibre cartridge for its then new Icon bolt action rifle. Hornady’s Dave Emary is said to have modified the .307 Winchester case by thinning its case walls, shortening it and turning it into rimless configuration to create the .30 TCU cartridge. Both the .307 Winchester and .30 TCU have now fallen by the wayside. The 6.5 Creedmoor is said to have been created by necking a .30 TCU cartridge down to 6.5mm by means of a 30° shoulder. I find this a bit strange, as it would have been simpler to use the .308 Winchester case.

 

The 6.5 Creedmoor has 0.37° body taper and a 30° shoulder, as opposed to the .260 Remington’s 0.69° body taper and 20° shoulder. Despite the Creedmoor being 0.115” (2,92mm) shorter than the .260 Remington, these features, combined with thinner case walls resulted in the .260 Remington beating the Creedmoor by just shy of 4% in the water capacity stakes. The 6.5 Creedmoor has the advantage of a 107.6% of calibre neck as opposed to the Remington’s 97.9% neck.

 

This all sounds as if the 6.5 Creedmoor is way ahead of the .260 Remington and in factory format it does indeed lead, but there is a lot that can be done to ‘improve’ the .260 Remington. For example, if both cartridges are loaded to the same overall length (2.825”) and the same pressure level (62,000 psi – 428 MPa), the performance outcomes actually favour the .260 Remington. The margins are so small however that I have come to consider the two cartridges identical performers.

Dave-Emary-Creedmoor-Hornady

Dave Emery has since retired, but he was one of the conceivers of the 6.5 Creedmoor and played a crucial role in its development. Dave was also involved in the design of several other cartridges during his tenure at Hornady Manufacturing.

It is commonly claimed by retweeting gunwiters that the tighter twist of the 6.5 Creedmoor and its ability to stabilize heavier bullets than the .260 Remington is what gives it the edge. That may be so when used across bush-ranges (≤ 150 yards) and when using 156 – 160 grain bullets. Truth is – nobody uses the Creedmoor in that fashion. The Creedmoor is used across extended ranges in both match and hunting application. It is so rare to find any hunter using bullets heavier than 143 grains for any application, that it can effectively be discounted as an advantage or consideration.

 

The CaB-Ratio of the 6.5 Creedmoor is 71.8 and the Expansion Ratio 7.8. That is middle of the road for both features and translates to reasonable barrel life. The Creedmoor’s CIP ‘S’ measurement or gas turbulence point is inside the case neck – even if barely so. If that is indeed beneficial as claimed by some, I find the position too precariously close (0.03” – 0,76mm) to the mouth to render a truly tangible benefit. An aspect that counts in favour of the Creedmoor is that it usually requires less of a given propellant than the .260 Remington for comparable performance. I compiled a VC Comparison table from the load data tables. According to the data used the Remington requires 2.1% more propellant to achieve a 3 fps (0.11%) velocity advantage. The Creedmoor’s conversion of propellant to velocity (Velocity ÷ Charge) ratio is 1.9% better in the example used. All this means that a 6.5 Creedmoor is the more efficient and that Creedmoor barrels should last to around 2,000 shots in competition and 3,000 for hunting use.

Bullet Propellant   260 Rem 6.5 Creedmoor  
Weight   Type Charge  Velocity V/C  Charge Velocity  V/C
160  H-4350 43.0   2538   59.0  40.6 2500 61.6
150 H-4350   42.0 2635 62.7  41.2 2638 64.0
140 H-4350 42.2 2755 65.3 42.3 2731 64.6
130  H-4350 42.7 2816 65.9  43.0 2800 65.1
120 H-4350 46.5 2960 63.7 45.0  3022 67.2
Average    43.3  2741 63.3  42.4 2738 64.5

 

Performance & Application

 

Handload Performance Figures at 100% Bullet Expansion (24.0” Barrel)

Bullet Velocity Muzzle RTP RTP RTP RTP Recoil
Weight  Threshold Energy Muzzle 100 yd 200 yd 300 yd 8 lb Rifle
160-grain 2,575 fps 2,356 ft/lb 35.1 30.7 26.6 23.0 16.4 ft/lb
156-grain 2,625 fps 2,387 ft/lb 35.6 31.6 28.0 24.7 16.6 ft/lb
150-grain 2,700 fps 2,429 ft/lb 36.2  32.0 28.2 24.7 16.9 ft/lb
143-grain 2,775 fps  2,446 ft/lb 36.5 32.0 27.9 24.3 16.9 ft/lb
140-grain 2,800 fps 2,438 ft/lb 36.4 31.7 27.5 23.8  16.9 ft/lb
135-grain  2,850 fps   2,435 ft/lb 36.3   31.6 27.3 23.5 17.0 ft/lb
130-grain 2,900 fps 2,428 ft/lb  36.4 31.1 26.7 22.7 17.1 ft/lb
123-grain   2,950 fps 2,377 ft/lb 35.5 30.1 25.3 21.2 17.4 ft/lb
120-grain 2,975 fps 2,439 ft/lb 36.4 30.7 25.7 21.4 17.6 ft/lb
110-grain  3,125 fps 2,399 ft/lb  35.6 29.1 23.7 19.1 17.6 ft/lb
100-grain 3,225 fps 2,310 ft/lb 34.4  27.2 21.3 16.5 16.3 ft/lb

 Averaged CSM = 5.29 lb (2,40 kg)

The bullets used for the calculation of the RTP (Relative Trauma Potential), and the Green-Band are quality hunting bullets, not extended range, high ballistic coefficient paper punchers. The hunting bullets used, drop below 2,600 fps at the end of the Red-Band, below 2,200 fps at the end of the Green-Band and below 2,000 fps where the Amber-Band ends.

 

The 6.5 Creedmoor is a great extreme range match cartridge, but for hunting it’s just a 350-yard option and can be stretched to 500 yards given a carefully selected bullet. That disregards my half-second time of flight principle. The needs of hunters differ massively from that of the extended range target shooter. The latter is not at all concerned about terminal ballistics. Their concerns are with external ballistics, not terminal ballistics. Sport shooters want to minimize time of flight, achieve the flattest trajectory possible and extend the supersonic velocity of the bullet as far as possible.

 

Whereas the 140-gr hunting bullet used in the tables fall below 2,000 fps at around 475 yards already and goes subsonic around 1,225 yards. A Berger 140-gr Match Hybrid Target bullet will, for example, only do so at around 585 and 1,575 yards respectively, depending on altitude and atmospheric conditions.

 

Hunters are concerned with reliable expansion, bullet integrity, wound channels and venison destruction. It is so that Karamojo (Walter Bell) hunted elephants with a 6,5mm cartridge in days gone by, but let’s be honest; none of us is Karamojo Bell and times have changed. We should use cartridges within more realistic parameters.

 

A realistic approach is that he 6,5mm cartridges are small game cartridges best suited to species weighing up to 330 lb (150 kg) on the hoof.

Handloading

 

Hornady, Peterson, ADG and Lapua are the leading manufactures of cases for the Creedmoor. Hornady’s have standard large rifle primer pockets while Lapua offers both large and small rifle primer pockets.

 

I am not convinced small primer cases indeed deliver better precision than large primer cases, but as far as I’m concerned, that is only relevant for extreme range precision. Even competitive shooters are at odds about the matter. When you investigate this aspect, it becomes obvious that small primer preferring shooters are pushing the Creedmoor beyond specification. So, we are facing the same

The other big name in the development of the 6.5 Creedmoor was Joe Thielen, also of Hornady. Here Joe is with a nice nyala bull he bagged.

situation with the Creedmoor as the 6mm situation that led to its creation! The high pressures generated by pushing the cartridge beyond specification stretch the primer pockets rather quickly. To strengthen the case head and improve case web integrity, Lapua opted to leave more brass in the area by opting for the smaller primer option. I remain a sceptic.

 

What I can confirm is that case volumetric consistency and case neck tension are major contributors to long-range precision. Lapua cases are extremely consistent out of the box and should be case of choice for the precision shooter. To extract the utmost precision from the 6.5 Creedmoor, rigorous case classification of neck wall consistency and water capacity should be applied. That must be followed by dedicated case preparation steps such as primer pocket uniforming, flash hole deburring, neck turning and regular annealing. So are the use of a top-class press, competition dies and loading techniques.

 

The 6.5 Creedmoor works with a variety of slow-burning propellants in the H-4350 to H-4831 bracket with all bullet weights. Vihtavuori is the one company that developed a dedicated 6.5 Creedmoor propellant: N-555. It burns between the two Hodgdon/ADI propellants mention above.

Bullet  Propellant  Min Max Max Barrel Data
Weight  Type Load Load Velocity Length  Source
160-gr Bullet Accurate AA-4350 37.0 39.8 2450 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 9th Ed. 2012
Alliant Rel-15 34.0 37.2 2450 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
Hodgdon H-4350 37.5 40.6 2500 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
HodgdonVarget 33.4 35.2 2400 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
IMR-4350  37.7 40.5 2600 24.0”  Hornady Handbook. 2021
Norma URP 37.0  39.9 2500 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
Norma N-203 33.6 36.7  2450 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
Ramshot BigGame 36.8 40.2 2500 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
Somchem S-385  41.5   44.0  2600 24.0” Handload. Not pressure tested
Somchem S-361  41.5 43.6 2526  24.0” Handload. Not pressure tested
Somchem S-365 39.9 41.8  2600  24.0” Handload. Not pressure tested
Somchem S-355  34.1 36.4 2525  24.0”  Handload. Not pressure tested
Winchester WW-760 40.0 42.9 2550 24.0” Hornady Handbook. 2021
Winchester WW-748 34.4 36.5 2400 24.0”  Hornady Handbook. 2021​

 

Bio

Pierre van der Walt grew up on a farm and began hunting from a very young age. He was just ten years old when he took part in his first lion hunt and captured a cub to keep as a pet. During the Angolan War, he served as a combat officer, and subsequently qualified as both a lawyer and a professional hunter. He published his first firearm article in 1992 and has since become Africa’s most prolific outdoor writer. In 2023, he was awarded the John T. Amber Literary Prize by the US publication Gun Digest for an article on the history and evolution of Czech hunting rifles. He has published four books that are internationally recognised as definitive works on hunting cartridges within the African context, and co-authored The Complete Professional Hunter’s Handbook, which is used as the official manual for professional hunter training in South Africa.

What was said about –

 

African Small Game Cartridges

African Small Game Cartridges is the third book in the author’s highly acclaimed series on hunting cartridges for Africa. Just like his previous two books (African Dangerous Game Cartridges and African Medium Game Cartridges), African Small Game Cartridges, is the most comprehensive ever discussion of the cartridges covered.

 

Like the previous books, it is destined to become yet another reference standard, which will serve the international and African hunting, shooting and reloading fraternities for decades. A generous part of African Small Game Cartridges is dedicated to relevant topics such as barrel life, understanding riflescopes, suppressors, and ballistic coefficients.

 

This coffee table quality reference work extends 480 pages with 350 excellent full colour images and countless performance tables of Africa’s 33 currently most popular .172, .224, 6mm, .257 and 6,5mm hunting cartridges. It takes readers on a grand tour of their history, specifica tions, design features, performance and field application, as well as the reloading quirks of each of these cartridges. African Small Game Cartridges provides unequalled data – around 7,200 loads for American, Australian, African, European and Scandinavian propellants.

 

International experts have made the following comments about this book

 

Johan van Wyk (Australia),Editor of SA Hunter magazine

Hunters and shooters are constantly bombarded by marketing onslaughts from all corners, each pretending to be punting the greatest cartridge or item. While progress cannot be halted, we need to sort the wheat from the chaff, especially for the more novice amongst us. With two authoritative books already under his belt, Pierre van der Walt is well qualified to not only steer the inexperienced in the right direction, but to also provide plenty of food for thought for the experienced. I unreservedly give African Small Game Cartridges the thumbs-up. It is well researched and a worthy addition to any shooter’s gunroom.

 

Mats Bergholm (Sweden) Weapon Systems Expert – Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV)

Pierre van der Walt has done it yet again! His first book, African Dangerous Game Cartridges, is the definitive tome about calibers for Africa’s biggest and deadliest. This book, African Small Game Cartridges, Pierre’s third, is nothing short of a masterpiece. It covers the tiniest ‘African’ calibers, but it is as fascinating from a northern European perspective. The calibers presented also cover calibres used for northern European game hunting, from grouse to elk and non-Africa focused hunters world-wide will benefit equally from this book’s overabundance of information. It fits just as well as a coffee table book in a Swedish moose hunting lodge as it does at a game lodge on the banks of the Limpopo River.

 

Ira Larivers (Zimbabwe) Editor African Hunter Magazine

Unequalled! The subject matter in this book fills a gap in Africana and international literature. The fact that it was written by the master of the genre, Pierre van der Walt, makes it essential reading. Apart from crucial calibre choices, he also covers many other important topics. Everything is very well presented. It includes a detailed appraisal of the 33 Africa popular small game cartridges, plus some lesser-known gems such as the .224 African. African Small Game Cartridges offers unprecedented cutting-edge information and a myriad of high-quality photos in a lasting format. Don’t miss out.

Understanding Riflescope Terminology

By Pierre van der Walt

The Human Eye

The human eye, with its restrictions and abilities, forms an indispensable part of the riflescope as a sighting system. Optical engineers are compelled to take this into consideration when designing a riflescope, thereby adapting it to the human eye.

It is, therefore, important to grasp the fundamental functioning and limitations of the eye in order to understand the workings of a riflescope.

The human eye can roughly be described as a spherical organ with a 25mm diameter. It consists of a transparent section known as the cornea. Behind the cornea one finds an aqueous-filled anterior chamber, and then the iris which surrounds the lens perimeter and also slightly overlaps it. At the back of the eye there is a reasonably large chamber known as the vitreous body. The rear three-quarters of the inside of the eye consists of a layer of light-sensitive receptors known as the retina. Insofar as riflescope use is concerned, the most important sections of the eye are the cornea, lens and the retina.

Light is necessary for sight. Light rays reflected by any object pass through the cornea and then through the lens to focus on the retina. The image on the retina is then transmitted through the optic nerve to the brain where awareness of the image takes place. The amount of light that can penetrate the eye is controlled by the diameter of the pupil. Pupil diameter is controlled by the involuntary muscles of the iris. In bad light the pupil enlarges and in good light it contracts.

The maximum diameter to which the pupil can expand is about 0.275” (7mm), and then only in pitch darkness. As soon as light passes through the pupil the lens (which has a biconvex shape) is refracted. The refraction focuses the light rays on the retina.

Aberration

Once light rays have passed through the scope lens and having been refracted by the lens glass, it moves through the vitreous body and focuses the image on the eye’s retina. The best focus occurs on a point which is in line with the visual axis of the eye. This point is referred to as the fovea. The focus at other areas of the retina is not as crisp as at the fovea, mainly because of the angle with which the incoming light rays fall on the retina and the imperfect focal points thereof. Light refracted by having passed through a convex lens furnishes a poor image at high magnification. This occurs because the light rays pass through the lens at different points and a complete image does not form at exactly the same horizontal distance from the lens. The centre of the lens has the longest focal length. The focal lengths of surrounding lens areas shorten in direct relation to the curves of the surrounding lens surface. This problematic phenomenon is known as aberration.

Several different types of aberration exist, but are not of any importance for purposes hereof. Chester Moore Hall (1703 – 1771) solved the problem created by aberration by combining crown glass (glass not containing lead or iron) and flint glass (which has different refracting indexes) in a single lens assembly consisting of a convex crown grass lens and a concave flint glass. This enabled him to focus the rays of white light on a single focal point with virtually no separation of the different rays which make up white light.

Ballistic Turrets

These are turrets on riflescopes that offer multiple zero options. In other words, the hunter can zero across various known distances. Say at 100 yards, 200 yards and 350 yards, he can simply dial the range in and shoot with less or no holdover depending on the exact range to the target.

Erector & Field Lenses

One of the most important differences between astronomical and riflescopes is that the latter sports erector lenses in order to furnish an upright image.

Apart from objective, ocular and erector lenses, modern riflescopes also contain field lenses. These lenses influence the route that light rays take through a riflescope and determine the field of view.

Light rays passing through the objective lens group are bent by the convex shape, thereby resulting in an inverted image. Because this group consists of different types of glass, aberrations are corrected and all light rays focus at the same point.

The light then passes through the erector group which turns the image upright. The erector lenses once again have a focal point where the image is in perfect focus. From here the light passes through the ocular lens group into the eye.

In order to have any use as a sight, a riflescope must have sighting mechanism. In modern riflescopes it is the reticules or crosshairs, dot, or whatever reference points has been used.

The reticules must at all times be clearly visible to the shot. There are only two places inside a riflescope where a sharply focused image of the target at all times exists and those are the focal points of the objective and erector lens groups. These focal points are the only places where reticules can be installed in such a manner that both target and reticules are well focused and appear as clear images. Once the light has passed through all the riflescope lenses it reaches a point where the shot can see everything that has been reflected on the objective lens. This point is at the focal length of the ocular lens group, and the distance between this point and the ocular lens group is known as eye relief. Theoretically, this means that there is only one critical point behind a riflescope where a shot can place his eye and see a complete and clear image. In practice, aberration comes to the aid of the shot in this regard because all the light rays exiting from the ocular lens do not have the exact focal length. It is possible to move the eye slightly to the front or the rear of the focal plane and still see a satisfying image. This contributes to fast eye alignment and reduces aiming time, both of which are very important to the hunter.

Eye Relief

Eye relief is the distance at which you can see the full image view through the scope and determines how far behind the riflescope’s ocular (rear) lens the hunter will place his eye for optimum visibility. If you move your eye nearer or further back from the objective (rear) lens, the field of view begins to constrict. Insufficient (short) eye relief will force the hunter to hold his eye close to the riflescope and he can then be hurt when recoil slams the riflescope back into his face. Long eye relief enables the hunter to safely fire hard-recoiling riflescopes without risk of injury. Eye relief varies as magnification on a riflescope is adjusted. The higher one cranks the magnification up, the shorter the eye relief becomes.

The average eye relief for centerfire caliber riflescopes is about 3” (75mm). Riflescopes designed for big bore rifles normally have eye relief varying between 3.5” – 5” (90 – 127mm), and rimfire rifle riflescopes have only 2” (50mm).

Exit Pupil

The extent to which the light rays that fall on a riflescope’s objective lens can be concentrated depends on riflescope magnification, because the riflescope’s exit pupil is determined by dividing the objective lens diameter by the magnification of the riflescope.

A riflescope with a 4x magnification and an objective lens diameter of 40mm has a 10mm exit pupil (40 ÷ 4 = 10mm). In order to fully utilize a riflescope’s objective lens diameter, its resolving power must be sufficient to create an exit pupil with the exact diameter of the human pupil under the prevailing light conditions. To illustrate: A riflescope with a 40mm objective lens requires 7x – 8x magnification to fully utilize the 40mm of lens diameter, because in early morning and late afternoon light the human pupil has a diameter of 0.197”-0.236” (5 – 6 mm). For example: (40mm lens ÷ 7x magnification = 5,7mm exit pupil and 40 ÷ 8 = 5mm).
Optical tests conducted by the Americans during the Second World War established that the human eye can contract to ±0.1” (±2,5mm) in bright light. At dusk, with a light intensity of one candlelight (stated as a candela) the human pupil diameter is 0.197” (5mm).

Suppose you are hunting on a very clear day in bright sunshine and will most likely have a pupil diameter of ±.12” (3mm) and intend using a 4x magnification riflescope. The objective lens diameter will only have to be 0.472” (12mm – 3mm exit pupil x 4 magnification = 12mm). If the objective lens diameter is any larger it will pick up reflections and images under these conditions that the human pupil is unable to absorb.
But light conditions vary, and sometimes the light is poor. Under such conditions your pupil will expand to, say 0.236” (6mm). A 12mm objective lens will absorb insufficient light under such conditions to allow optimum vision, and such a riflescope will be useless, the reason being that the eye pupil of 6mm requires a 6mm exit pupil and a 24mm objective lens (6mm pupil diameter x 4 magnification = 24mm objective lens).
It is for the abovementioned reason that no modern riflescope sports a 12mm objective lens diameter. Another reason exists. A larger diameter exit pupil enables a shot to align his eye faster and easier, because his eye does not have to be exactly behind the centre of the riflescope’s ocular lens. The drawback of unused image whilst using large objective lenses is a small price to pay for the added convenience of better vision and ease of alignment.

Very view advantages in optics come free, and the convenience of a large exit pupil on a riflescope holds the disadvantage of parallax. More about that later.

Field of View

If a hunter holds his eye at the correct eye relief distance from the ocular lens, a cone of sight stretches from the eye pupil to the rim of the ocular lens. This cone forms an angle stretching from the lens rim on the one to the eye and back to the opposite side of the lens rim. This angle is the maximum angle that can be seen through the particular riflescope and is known as the field of view. Suppose a riflescope with a 6x magnification has a field of view of 24°. The visible field at 100 metres will be approximately 37 metres. Because this distance is magnified 6x (reduced) by the particular riflescope, one must divide the distance (37 metres) by 6x. The actual field of view at 100m then is 6,16m (20.2ft). Although it sounds logical to express a riflescope’s field of view in degrees, valid for all distances, most manufacturers express the field of view as one distance at another, for example, 12,8 metres at 100 metres. This system is more concrete and easier to grasp. It means that the shot will see an area of 12,8 m diameter at a distance of 100 metres. At 50 metres he will see 6,4m (half) and at 200 metres 25,6 metres (double).

A riflescope’s field of vision can be widened in three ways:

  • The first is to reduce eye relief. The problem created by this method is that the aiming eye must be held to near to the ocular bell. Recoil can then cause injury when the scope is slammed into the shooter’s face.
  • Another approach is to reduce magnification.
  • The third and easiest solution is to simply increase ocular lens (rear lens) diameter.

Focal Plane & Reticule Position

Where reticules are placed in a riflescope affects the way in which they are perceived by the hunter. A reticule placed in front of the erector assembly (first focal plane) remains in the same visual proportion to the target across the riflescope’s entire range of magnification. The hunter will perceive this as a change in reticule thickness with changes in magnification. In reality the reticules are actually in proportion to the target. It is a system often found on European riflescopes and is not particularly liked in Africa and America, but provides good range-finding capability.

Reticules placed behind the erector assembly (second focal plane) will always stay the same size.

Fixed Power Riflescopes

Fixed power riflescopes are becoming increasingly scarcer as they do not offer the convenience of varying the magnification to suit the size of and distance to the target. Such riflescopes offer a singular magnification, but actually work very well.

Focusing Riflescopes

Not everybody has 20-20 vision and riflescopes must be adjustable to suit different eyes. Riflescope focus adjustment is effected by adjusting the ocular (rear) lens group.

Hunters without refraction errors can use a simple procedure to focus their riflescopes. Relax the eyes by looking at something distant without objects the eye can fix on, such as the cloudless sky. Turn the focus ring on the rear end of the riflescope fully to one side. Then bring the riflescope in position in front of the aiming eye and hold it at the same distance that it will be when shooting. Look THROUGH the riflescope and not at the reticules. If the reticules appear fussy or have a ghost image, adjust the ocular bell until they appear focused when executing the test. Do not keep the riflescope in front of the eye for more than a few seconds otherwise the eye will adapt. Then execute a half-turn on the adjustment ring and repeat the process until at some stage the reticules immediately appear sharp when the riflescope is peeked through.

Lens Coating

It is obvious that the more of the light that falls on the objective (front) lens that makes it out the ocular (rear) lens the better the hunter will see. A riflescope that only allows 60 % of the light that reflects on the objective lens to pass into the eye is not as good as one that allows 97% of such light to pass into the eye.

It is a well-known fact that glass does not allow all light that falls on its surface to come through. Approximately 4% of the light that falls on untreated glass is reflected at each surface where glass and air meet. This figure is equally valid for the surface where light enters glass than for the surface where it exits from glass. Because riflescopes easily contain ten lenses, 40% or more light can theoretically be lost in the process of passing through it.

The problem of light reflection and loss was largely solved by Professor Olexander Smakula (1900 – 1983) of the German firm Zeiss during the 1930s by coating lens surfaces with a thin layer of refractive fluoride and other chemicals. This process was extremely successful. These days, riflescope lenses are coated with numerous layers of chemicals, and some manufacturers claim light transmission through their riflescopes to be as high as 99%. Bear in mind that different light conditions and different eye conditions and colour-blindness levels cause hunters to experience different coatings differently. Some eyes react well to certain types of coating and others not.

Light Transmission – Relative Brightness of Riflescopes

The prospective riflescope purchaser should avail himself of two other terms – the Relative Brightness and the Twilight Factor of a riflescope. Otherwise he will be misled by the performance claimed for a riflescope in poor light conditions.

For many years most riflescope manufacturers published relative brightness indexes for their riflescopes, thereby propagating that a higher brightness factor meant better twilight performance. Relative brightness as a term bandied about is nothing but the square of the riflescope’s exit pupil diameter. The exit pupil diameter is, of course, the diameter of the light beam which exits from the ocular lens and can be determined by holding the riflescope at arm’s length. The bright spot visible on the ocular lens is the exit pupil. Because the exit pupil is determined by the amount of light which pass through the riflescope, it had incorrectly been accepted as a good method to determine a riflescope’s ability to function effectively in poor light. This is incorrect.

Simply put, the exit pupil of a riflescope can be increased by enlarging the objective lens diameter, as the exit pupil is the objective lens diameter divided by the riflescope’s magnification, i.e. 42mm (1,65″) lens diameter divided by 7x magnification = 6mm (0,236″) exit pupil. The brightness index of a riflescope with a 6mm exit pupil is 6×6 = 36. Another example is a 56mm (2,2″) lens diameter divided by 7x magnification which results in an 8mm (0,315″) and a brightness factor of 8×8 = 64. The latter’s relative brightness is 64 which is better than the 36, because the exit pupil is larger.

The relative brightness of two lenses with the same objective lens diameter will differ if their magnifications differ. For example, divide a 56mm lens by 8 magnification, and you will end up with a 7mm (0,275″) exit pupil. If you divide a 56mm lens diameter by 4X magnification it gives a 14mm (0,551″) exit pupil. The riflescope with the smaller magnification has the largest exit pupil and the square thereof will, naturally, also be the largest. Nobody can blame any hunter being under the impression that riflescopes with low magnification are better suited to low light conditions than high magnification.

The truth is that the pupil of the human eye can only open up to a certain extent: ±0.2” (±5mm) in hunting conditions. At that aperture the eye can, like a camera, only absorb and utilize a certain amount of light, being of 0.2” (5mm) diameter. A large diameter light beam cannot penetrate the pupil. Just like a 4” (100mm) pipe cannot accommodate all the water from an 8” (200mm) pipe in the same time without increasing pressure. Riflescopes cannot increase light’s pressure. So, the relative brightness figure is a useless consideration when evaluating a riflescope intended for twilight use and hunters should not be misled by it.

Light Transmission – Twilight Factor of Riflescopes

A riflescope with a high magnification is better suited to poor light conditions because it shows more detail. This is proved and measured by the so-called twilight factor (TF). The twilight factor is determined by multiplying the objective lens diameter with the riflescope’s magnification and then determining its square root.

Example 1 TF = √ lens diameter x magnification
TF = √ 32 x 4
TF = √ 128
TF = 11,3
Example 2 TF = √ lens diameter x magnification
TF = √ 32 x 8
TF = √ 256
TF = 16

The riflescope in example 2 has a higher twilight factor and is therefore better suited to hunting in poor light. What it all boils down to is that a larger objective lens diameter or a higher magnification are both positive factors in poor light.

 

Objective Lens Diameter

The size or diameter of a riflescopes objective lens is governed by the wave theory of light. Light rays move from one point to another in a wave pattern, like ripples in a pool. This causes the outline of an image to become somewhat hazy, almost as if the object is vibrating.

Because of this vibration it is, practically speaking, virtually impossible to observe an absolute perfect point image of any object through a lens. Each point of an image consists of a spot of light with a diffraction ring surrounding it. This ring is called the Airy disc. The only solution is to increase lens size, thereby admitting a greater area of the wave front and then to concentrate the same tightly for better visual resolution. This can be illustrated by drawing something on a large scale. By reducing its size, certain detail is lost, yet it shows more detail then would have been the case had it initially been drawn on a small scale. In the case of lenses this can only be achieved by using objective lenses with a larger diameter.

In order to use the image reflected on the riflescope’s objective lens, the light must penetrate the eye. The light that penetrates the eye must be concentrated in a beam with a diameter not exceeding normal pupil diameter, that being 0.275” (7mm) in pitch darkness and about 0.197” (5mm) in light suitable for hunting. If this image beam (exit pupil) is larger than the pupil, the eye will be unable to see the whole image reflected on the objective lens.

Parallax

Parallax is normally defined as the apparent displacement of an object relative to another because of a shift in the point from which the object is viewed.

This can be practically illustrated with the same example used to determine the dominant eye of a shot – with minor adaptions. Stretch an arm with the hand in the classical hiking gesture out in front of the head, simultaneously aligning the thumb with an object a few metres away whilst keeping one eye closed. Switch eyes without moving the hand or head at all. The thumb will not be lined up with the object anymore. Yet neither the thumb nor the object has moved. It is just the point or angle of observation that has changed. If the thumb is held against the object the apparent movement, because of different observation points, will be minimal or non- existent.

Parallax is one of those terms that baffle most hunters simply because it sounds complicated. In reality, the aspects regarding parallax that the hunter has to master are few and relatively simple, as it is unnecessary to understand or use any mathematical means.

The existence of parallax in all riflescopes is easily determined. Place a riflescope on a solid rest and aim it at an object about ten metres off. Then move the aiming eye horizontally to and fro behind the scope. The reticules will appear to move relative to the point of aim. Yet it is not the case. Once again it is merely the point of observation that moves.

From this we can deduct that if the aiming eye pupil is not exactly aligned with the centre of the exit pupil of the light rays, an angle is created between the eye’s line of sight and the axis of the light moving through the riflescope. This causes parallax and results in a point of impact differing from the point of aim indicated by the reticules to the off-center aiming eye.

This error is so slight that it can be ignored during short-distance hunting. The effect is more pronounced across longer ranges. A long-range hunter normally has sufficient time to align his eye properly, thereby eliminating parallax. For this reason it is important to choose a riflescope with a small exit pupil for long-distance use. Even though the manufacturer claims it to be parallax-free, it is not parallax-free over all distances. That is why a parallax adjustment feature has been introduced on riflescopes to be used at long range. If hunting distances are short or hunting conditions of such a nature that aiming time will be short, riflescopes with larger exit pupils will offer an advantage.

Although the time parallax and its effect are now understood, it remains necessary to explain the reason for its existence.

At the discussion of erector lenses it was stated that the reticules must be placed at the focal length of these lenses to present a clear image of target and reticules, and to place both on the same visual plane.
We all know that a magnifying glass must be held a specific distance from an object in order to present the clearest image to the eye. In layman’s terms it can be said that the moment the magnifying glass is moved away from that point, the focal length does not coincide with the viewer’s eye and the image blurs. A riflescope has the same effect. Because the reticules cannot be moved around in the scope due to design, it follows that the lenses must be calibrated to form their focal points at the reticule position. This, on the other hand, means that the relevant lens group can only be a specific distance away from the target.

Riflescope manufacturers, therefore, choose an arbitrary distance for the target according to where the lenses are calibrated to have the correct focal length. In riflescopes intended for centerfire hunting rifles this distance normally is 100 metres or 100 yards.

The hunter virtually never finds a target at exactly the distance his riflescope is calibrated for and so the focal point inside the riflescope does not form exactly at the desired point where the reticules are situated. This results in the reticules and the image not being on the same plane. The same phenomenon as with the thumb example occurs when the point of observation is moved. Parallax occurs. The nearer the distance between the target and the relevant lens is to the arbitrary 100 metres, the nearer to the desired point the focal point forms and the smaller parallax becomes. The further beyond 100 metres the target stands the progressively more pronounced parallax again becomes.

Some riflescopes, especially high magnification target and silhouette riflescopes being used over known distances, are fitted with an external adjustment ring on the objective bell or a parallax adjustment knob on the turret. This enables the shot to focus the riflescope for each distance over which the riflescope is used in order to eliminate parallax.

Rangefinding Reticules

These riflescopes were originally developed for the military and originally employed a so-called mil-dot system in terms of which the sniper bracketed his target between the cross on the scope reticule and a series of dots, and then calculated the range to the target. It is quite accurate.

Civilians generally do not take the trouble to master the mil-dot system and a variety of simpler systems have been developed for them. This ranges from bracketing animal bodies between sets of lines to a variety of other systems. The advent of portable laser rangefinders has largely eliminated the need for this kind of system, but it remains popular for some reason.

Resolving Power – Human Eye

The resolving power of the average human eye is about one minute, or a 16th°, which means that a normal and healthy human eye can distinguish an object (say blocks on a chessboard) of about 1” (25,4mm) in diameter at 100 yards. If the chess board is moved further afield, the human eye will find it progressively more difficult to distinguish each square until a point is reached where the chessboard will appear grey.

 

Resolving Power (Magnification) – Riflescopes
The resolving power of a riflescope is the relationship between the riflescope’s magnification and the human eye’s resolving power. A riflescope with a 4x magnification will enable the human eye looking through it to distinguish a square (or any object for that matter) over four times the distance the naked eye is able to. Put differently: Over any given distance such a riflescope will enable the shot to distinguish a square a quarter of the size that the naked eye can. The ability of any riflescope to distinguish an object and its details depends on:

  • The type of glass used;
  • The quality of such glass;
  • The degree to which aberrations have been corrected;
  • The diameter of the objective lens.

As a result of modern technology there is a large number of types of optical glass in existence, each with its own properties. Quality and uniformity of the end product depends on the ability of the manufacturer to maintain batch-to-batch consistency.

Trajectory Compensating Riflescopes

See Ballistic Turrets above. Such riflescopes are specifically designed to change the point of impact according to the distances over which the shooting is done. These riflescopes contain certain distance settings. In other words, it is adjustable for distances like 100m, 200m, 300m and so forth. Such a riflescope is sighted in at say 100m and can then be calibrated to be on target at any of the other distance settings when adjusted.

Variable (Power) Riflescopes

A variable power riflescope offers the hunter a range of enlargements (magnification options). If he hunts at close range or large animals, the hunter can reduce the magnification and, if the animal is small or distant, he can increase the magnification to see the target much more enlarged.

 

This will close in 2 seconds

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.