Aug 28, 2013 | News
In the past South African hunters obtained temporary firearm export permits from the SAPS upon arrival at border posts. This will not be possible in future. The SAPS now requires hunters to apply for temporary firearm export permits at their local DFOs at least three weeks before departure. Should the process experience a hiccup, the hunter may find himself not obtaining a permit timeously. Hunters are therefore advised by African Hunting Gazette to:
- Apply at least six weeks prior to departure
- Ensure that the serial numbers on their rifles are clear, legible, and correct.
Aug 28, 2013 | News
According to the RSA Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA), 553 rhino have been poached in South Africa to date. A spokesman for the WorldWide Fund for Nature in South Africa (WWF-SA) is reported to have said that the overall rhino population will soon begin declining.
It is expected that in excess of the 2012 tally, 668 rhino will be poached this year. Aggressive anti-poaching operations have not proved particularly successful in the reduction of poaching activities despite the arrest of approximately 150 poachers this year. It does not appear that arrests of the actual poachers will solve the problem. The WWF-SA is apparently of the opinion that success might be achieved if the perpetrators higher up the chain should be targeted by law enforcement, because they form part of international organised crime syndicates.
Aug 28, 2013 | News
The Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) recently released the recommendations of the Rhino Issues Management (RIM) report. The report calls for the immediate dehorning of thousands of rhino in national parks. The report, written by former SA National Parks chief executive Mavuso Msimang, indicates that it would take three years at a rate of eight rhino per day and cost R84 million to dehorn SANParks rhinos, take DNA samples and insert microchips. Since rhino horn grows at 5cm per year the process will have to be repeated every 3-4 years. The government indicated that de-horning was not on the cards on the short term.
Mr Msimang also came up with a novel concept and urged the government to consider opening a rhino trading structure possibly linked to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and recommended that the government use Cites Article 27 to make an interim application to CITES to end the ban on rhino product trading and not wait for CITES 2016.
Aug 15, 2013 | News
According to media reports Tanzanian Natural Resources and Tourism Minister Ambassador Khamis Kagasheki the Tanzanian is collecting views from wildlife stakeholders on the establishment of the Tanzania Wildlife Authority (TAWA). TAWA appears to be intended as similar to TAWICO (Tanzania Wildlife Corporation – hunting company) of the past.
According to AllAfrica.com the minister, when opening a meeting aimed at getting views and advice from personnel who served in the Ministry, said: "We are expecting to complete the process of collecting views from stakeholders, leaders and the citizens on the plan by November this year." The Minister is quoted to have said that the plan will be endorsed by Members of Parliament during the November parliamentary sessions.
The Minister said that the establishment of the authority will enable the review of the current wildlife Act that has weaknesses towards better management of the wildlife conservations. "The review of the Act will enable the Authority take action and penalize those involved in the wildlife poaching accordingly,". He also noted that review of the Act will enable the Authority promote involvement of local communities participations in wildlife conservations.
Industry role players indicated to the AHG that they hoped that the step would improve the situation on the ground. It is said that in 1965, when Tanzania’s wildlife population was higher than today, there were 47 hunting blocks. By 1997, the number increased to over 140 hunting blocks. At the same time, the number of hunting companies increased from 9 in 1984 to 42 by 2004, and according to the Wengert email in 2013, around 52 hunting companies. The increase in hunting blocks was a combination of opening up new areas to hunting combined with subdivision of existing hunting blocks. For instance, in the late 1980s and through the mid-1990s, both Southern Maasailand and the Northern Maasailand hunting concessions were first subdivided; Southern Maasailand from 2 to 8 hunting blocks and Northern Maasiland from 2 to 6 hunting blacks. Moyowosi South hunting block was split into 2 in 2001, then reconstituted into 1 block and now apparently subdivided again. Subdivisions of hunting blocks continues to the point that many are too small for viable hunting. As an example Mto wa Mbu and Lake Natron are no longer viable for plains game (e.g., zebra, eland, Grants & Thomson gazelles, lesser kudu, etc.) as there are about 6 Hunting Blocks from Mto wa Mbu to Gelai Rumba up to the border with Kenya. This is also said to be the case with Moyowosi and Muhesi.
In all cases and continuing until today, it appears that in the subdivided hunting blocks, the old quotas for the single block were given to each of the new subdivided blocks, resulting in quotas being multiplied by as many as four times or more for short-term economic gain with little or no biological/empirical data to justify these subdivisions or to determine if they were/are sustainable. In addition to safari hunting quotas, quotas were given for game capture and game cropping in many blocks, as well as resident hunters quotas. This has resulted in a major drop in Tanzania’s trophy quality because of too high a harvest rate. While some increases in quotas may have been acceptable, certainly not to the extremes, as noted above.
It is expected that TAWA will have its hands full. Like any organization, its ability to manage wildlife will depend on the moral integrity of those who run it. The new director of TAWA will have to take a very close look at the implications of hunting block subdivisions and quota multiplications. If they are to take place they must be based upon credible scientific data and recommendations coming out of the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) in collaboration with TAHOA (Tanzania Hunting Operators Association).
Aug 5, 2013 | News
Comments about dissension among the hunting and wildlife organisations in South Africa in hunting industry publications in recent months, are in large measure, incorrect.
In 2005 SAHGCA, PHASA, CHASA, NSA and WRSA established an alliance to serve as a caucus. This initiative evolved into The Hunting and Wildlife Associations of South Africa (HAWASA). Although member associations represent their constituencies at Government forums in their own right, HAWASA is being recognised as credible representation of the wildlife industry at government forums on conservation and biodiversity and serves as a high-level spokesperson to support individual member associations in promoting the broader objectives of their specific domain in the hunting and wildlife sector.
HAWASA is familiar with the real and perceived threats to the sector, including negative public perceptions about certain aspects of the industry; bad-mouthing from anti-hunt and animal rights activists and pressure groups; and politically-driven actions i.e. land reform and regulatory processes that impact on hunters and wildlife ranchers. HAWASA is in the process of realigning its strategy to deal with these threats while striving to take the lead in the green economy.
The hunting and wildlife sector is a dynamic environment where the goal posts shift all the time and new challenges emerge continually. Individuals in the wildlife industry can rest assured that HAWASA approaches the challenges facing our industry, in a unified manner. That is also why it is so important for hunters, wildlife ranchers, firearm owners and everybody involved in the industry in whatever manner, to belong to their local associations.
Jul 30, 2013 | News
June 2013 (Xtreme Auction)
| Species |
Female Avg |
Male Avg |
| Blesbok, common |
R 1,179 |
R 1,900 |
| Blesbok, copper |
R 260,000 |
|
| Blesbok, yellow |
R 57,000 |
|
| Bontebok |
R 35,000 |
|
| Buffalo |
|
R 160,000 |
| Eland, Cape |
R 6,000 |
|
| Eland, Livingstone |
|
R 42,400 |
| Eland, white |
|
R 40,000 |
| Gemsbok, common |
R 3,800 |
|
| Gemsbok, golden |
R 210,000 |
R 205,000 |
| Giraffe |
R 26,000 |
|
| Hartebeest, red |
R 3,750 |
R 4,500 |
| Impala, common |
R 1,950 |
R 1,175 |
| Impala, black |
R 245,000 |
|
| Kudu |
R 2,988 |
R 14,834 |
| Lechwe |
R 11,000 |
R 11,500 |
| Nyala |
R 11,384 |
R 14,000 |
| Ostrich |
R 900 |
|
| Sable, common |
|
R 316,889 |
| Sable, Zambia |
R 370,000 |
R 880,000 |
| Sable, Tanzanian |
R 450,000 |
|
| Sable, western Zambian |
|
R 3,000,000 |
| Springbok, common |
R 2,400 |
|
| Springbok, copper |
R 13,000 |
|
| Tsessebe |
|
R 12,000 |
| Waterbuck |
R 3,000 |
R 7,750 |
| Wildebeest, blue |
R 3,579 |
R 8,750 |
| Wildebeest, golden |
|
R 260,000 |
| Zebra, Burchell’s |
R 4,710 |
|
| Zebra, Hartmann’s |
R 10,000 |
|