Reticules for Africa
![]() |
Crosshair Reticule |
| Advantages: The fine lines do not obscure small targets at range and it therefore is a suitable for long-range application on small animals and varmints. Quite acceptable for African plains game hunting during daytime | |
| Disadvantages: The fine lines are difficult to see in poor light or against dark backgrounds. It is a bright light only option for good eyes and slow shooting. | |
![]() |
Dot Reticule |
| Advantages: The dot provides an uncluttered image of the target and provides a very natural point for the eye to use as reference point. It mostly provides a bit faster target acquisition than the stand-alone Crosshair. Not popular in Africa. | |
| Disadvantages: It provides a single reference point, and if that is not visible in poor light or on dark target, then the hunter has no other means of aiming. That can be circumvented by opting for an illuminated dot. If the dot is large it limits the riflescope’s application to closer ranges or larger species. | |
![]() |
Target Dot Reticule |
| Advantages: It employs the strengths of both the Dot and the Crosshair designs and provides a natural reference point that can be used under a wider range of conditions and backgrounds than the stand-alone Dot. It is a bit more visible than the stand-alone Crosshair, especially when illuminated. It is an excellent choice for shooting at round targets as in target shooting. It is fine for African plains game hunting across bush and medium ranges | |
| Disadvantages: It provides a single reference point, and if that is not visible in poor light or on dark target, then the hunter has no other means of aiming. That can be circumvented by opting for an illuminated dot. If the dot is large it limits the riflescope’s application to closer ranges or larger species. | |
![]() |
Circle Dot Reticule |
| Advantages: The circle dot provides a large, readily visible target-encircling reference point that is very quick to acquire with a finer aiming dot providing precision if needed. It is very suitable for the hunting of moving targets at close range and is fine for thick-skinned African game, especially with illuminated capability. | |
| Disadvantages: It does obscure more of the target and, unless illuminated, it is not much better than the normal Dot design for normal hunting | |
![]() |
Duplex Reticule |
| Advantages: Justifiably the most popular reticule in the New World and probably the most sensible general hunting reticule, the Duplex offers the fine central aiming point in combination with bolder sections that remain visible under most daylight hunting conditions. It also offers the tips as reference points for windage and elevation. | |
| Disadvantages. The fine section of the reticule can still be ‘lost’ in some light and the bold sections obscure some target. This is resolved by using illuminated centre sections or the addition of a dot, black or illuminated. | |
![]() |
CPC Reticule |
| Advantages: It offers the advantages of the Duplex, with the additional benefit of tapered posts which are less intrusive of the sight picture. It is an excellent design for normal hunting in Africa across all ranges. Companies such as Schmidt & Bender offer a variety of German reticules options with CPC-style tapered posts. | |
| Disadvantages. It is useable in more light conditions than the normal Crosshair, but not as versatile as the Duplex. It also does not offer any alternative aiming points to the hunter. | |
![]() |
German #4 Reticule |
| Advantages: The bold posts are visible in almost any light conditions, and the absence of a heavy post above the aiming point provides a fairly good image of the target. When placed in the first focal plane of the riflescope, as often is the case with European riflescopes, the reticule size will appear to change with magnification. | |
| Disadvantages: The fine aiming section of the reticule is very narrow and a lot of the target is obscured by the heavy posts. It is not a fast reticule to use with precision. There is a shorter post version known as the German #7 | |
![]() |
CD Reticule (German #9) |
| Advantages: A very fast and intuitive system combining the German #7 reticule with the Circle Dot. It is an excellent African dangerous-game reticule, and in illuminated configuration it does not disappear on the dark skin of pachyderms. It essentially is a short-range system. | |
| Disadvantages: It is not suitable for long-range hunting or small game. As with all illuminated reticules, one has to be constantly aware of the state of the battery and carry extras, but battery life has improved dramatically over last few years. | |
![]() |
German Post (German #2) |
| Advantages: An excellent African reticule, especially on dangerous game, as it is bold enough to work in almost any light. It offers a very simple and uncluttered sight picture and can also be had configured with an illuminated arrow tip for fine aiming. | |
| Disadvantages: It obscures the body of small targets at range. The flat top is not as precise as a sharp tip or fine line, but it primarily is a large-game, short-range reticule. | |
![]() |
German #1 |
| Advantages: A bold reticule that works well in poor light and jungle conditions, especially when the post tip is illuminated. It provides the hunter with better vertical referencing than the German #2 post. It is a fine large- and dangerous-game system for short-range use. | |
| Disadvantages: The sharp tip can be lost in some light conditions and it also obscures small targets at range. | |
![]() |
German #56 |
| Advantages: This reticule has no notable advantage unless the dot is illuminated, in which case it offers a natural and easy to acquire reference point for short and medium ranges. | |
| Disadvantages: It does not offer the fine aiming reference of a crosshair or post with tip at perceived point of impact. If the dot is ‘lost’ on a dark target the hunter is in trouble as he will have to guess point of impact. | |
![]() |
Trajectory Compensating Reticule (Customized) |
| Advantages: Some companies such as Leupold offer hunters reticules with alternative elevation aiming points customized to the exact bullet and velocity combination used. This offer an uncluttered sight picture, very little guesswork, as it is only affected by atmospheric variation which is not that much across hunting ranges. Generally based on the Wide Duplex reticule, this most likely is the ultimate African hunting reticule. These reticules are best combined with a laser rangefinder for exact measurements. | |
| Disadvantages: The reticule is bullet- and velocity-specific, and the riflescope is forever tied to a single load that may become unavailable in time, and animals do not always stand at precisely calibrated ranges. It is also costly and time-consuming to send the riflescope to the manufacturer for the retrofit. The Ballistic Turret system is most probably a better option. | |
![]() |
Trajectory Compensating Reticule (General) |
| Advantages: These reticules enable the hunter to predetermine reticule reference points for bullet drop at different ranges. They are fast to use provided range is known. Some, such as the Swarovski TDS (not pictured), also provide range-finding capability based on fitting the animal chest or whither height between lines and calculating the range. Having the alternative bullet-drop aiming points reduces the amount of guesswork the hunter has to engage in, and also the degree to which he has to compensate for wind or elevation | |
| Disadvantages: Again these reticules, depending on actual design, do not always work that well in poor light. The SA Hunter depicted reticule is one of the better designs, from both visibility and simplicity perspectives. | |
![]() |
Range-finding Reticule (Mil-Dot) |
| Advantages: The Mil-Dot enables the hunter to scale the target of known size in relation to the Mil-Dots and use the result to calculate the range to the target. The reticule itself offers enough reference points to compensate accurately from the fall of a missed shot for a precise second shot. | |
| Disadvantages: The system requires some experience in the correct and accurate placement of the reticule on the target for the Mil-Dot reading, and is further dependent on the correct assumption of target size. It is a slow system that requires time to read and make calculations for which a calculator or reference sheet is required. It is easy to get confused by all the dots. Some designs alternate dots and bars and that improves the concept from a hunting perspective. | |
![]() |
Range-Finding Reticule (Animal-Scaling) |
| Advantages: Hunting-dedicated reticules employ a system whereby animals are fitted between scaling lines and the range then calculated by a variety of means. It enables the hunter to make a highly informed range estimation and offers windage referencing to various degrees. These reticules, such as on the Horus Vision versions can become very complicated and extremely cluttered. The South African Lynx RF reticule depicted works very well on African plains game. | |
| Disadvantages: It takes a bit of time to fit the target between the correct lines and make calculations. Sometimes grass and other objects affect the ability to place the correct animal parts between the lines and that affects the accuracy of results. Depending on the complexity of the actual design, hunters have to engage in the effort to really familiarize themselves with the system. These reticules often are difficult to use in poor light. | |
Zero Riflescope with One Shot
By Pierre van der Walt
Yes, it can be done! Assuming you have fired a fouling shot and you shoot straight.
| Step 1 | Set Target Up |
| Set a target up at the intended zero range, i.e. 100 yards.
For this method a round aiming point works best. The full aiming point must be visible through the barrel, so it must not be too large or too small. The closer the aiming point is in size to what you can see through the barrel, the more accurate the result is |
|
| Step 2 | Set Rifle Up |
| Remove the rifle’s bolt and place it on bags with which you can pack it down firmly. Equipment that works well for this purpose are:
Bullsbag X7 Modular System
Caldwell Lead Sled
|
|
| Step 3 | Aim through Barrel |
| Centre, and by centre we really mean centre, the target in the barrel and make the rifle immovable.
Then adjust the riflescope reticule to centre on the target.
|
|
| Step 4 | Fire the Shot |
| Fire the shot without moving the rifle.
Remove the bolt without moving the rifle or the rest/bag and adjust the rifle to regain the exact above correct sight picture through the barrel and riflescope. The ideal would be if no correction has to be made to the rifle, but recoil makes that virtually impossible. Make sure the rifle is packed tight once this is achieved. |
|
| Step 5 | Adjust Reticules |
| Now peek through the riflescope without moving anything and find the bullet impact point on the target.
Unless you are very lucky the bullet hole will be some distance from the aiming point and reticule position. Without moving the rifle or the rest/bag, adjust the reticules to centre on the bullet hole. |
|
Your rifle and scope are zeroed! You can verify it with a second shot.
Understanding Riflescope Terminology
By Pierre van der Walt
The Human Eye
The human eye, with its restrictions and abilities, forms an indispensable part of the riflescope as a sighting system. Optical engineers are compelled to take this into consideration when designing a riflescope, thereby adapting it to the human eye.
It is, therefore, important to grasp the fundamental functioning and limitations of the eye in order to understand the workings of a riflescope.
The human eye can roughly be described as a spherical organ with a 25mm diameter. It consists of a transparent section known as the cornea. Behind the cornea one finds an aqueous-filled anterior chamber, and then the iris which surrounds the lens perimeter and also slightly overlaps it. At the back of the eye there is a reasonably large chamber known as the vitreous body. The rear three-quarters of the inside of the eye consists of a layer of light-sensitive receptors known as the retina. Insofar as riflescope use is concerned, the most important sections of the eye are the cornea, lens and the retina.
Light is necessary for sight. Light rays reflected by any object pass through the cornea and then through the lens to focus on the retina. The image on the retina is then transmitted through the optic nerve to the brain where awareness of the image takes place. The amount of light that can penetrate the eye is controlled by the diameter of the pupil. Pupil diameter is controlled by the involuntary muscles of the iris. In bad light the pupil enlarges and in good light it contracts.
The maximum diameter to which the pupil can expand is about 0.275” (7mm), and then only in pitch darkness. As soon as light passes through the pupil the lens (which has a biconvex shape) is refracted. The refraction focuses the light rays on the retina.
Aberration
Once light rays have passed through the scope lens and having been refracted by the lens glass, it moves through the vitreous body and focuses the image on the eye’s retina. The best focus occurs on a point which is in line with the visual axis of the eye. This point is referred to as the fovea. The focus at other areas of the retina is not as crisp as at the fovea, mainly because of the angle with which the incoming light rays fall on the retina and the imperfect focal points thereof. Light refracted by having passed through a convex lens furnishes a poor image at high magnification. This occurs because the light rays pass through the lens at different points and a complete image does not form at exactly the same horizontal distance from the lens. The centre of the lens has the longest focal length. The focal lengths of surrounding lens areas shorten in direct relation to the curves of the surrounding lens surface. This problematic phenomenon is known as aberration.
Several different types of aberration exist, but are not of any importance for purposes hereof. Chester Moore Hall (1703 – 1771) solved the problem created by aberration by combining crown glass (glass not containing lead or iron) and flint glass (which has different refracting indexes) in a single lens assembly consisting of a convex crown grass lens and a concave flint glass. This enabled him to focus the rays of white light on a single focal point with virtually no separation of the different rays which make up white light.
Ballistic Turrets
These are turrets on riflescopes that offer multiple zero options. In other words, the hunter can zero across various known distances. Say at 100 yards, 200 yards and 350 yards, he can simply dial the range in and shoot with less or no holdover depending on the exact range to the target.
Erector & Field Lenses
One of the most important differences between astronomical and riflescopes is that the latter sports erector lenses in order to furnish an upright image.
Apart from objective, ocular and erector lenses, modern riflescopes also contain field lenses. These lenses influence the route that light rays take through a riflescope and determine the field of view.
Light rays passing through the objective lens group are bent by the convex shape, thereby resulting in an inverted image. Because this group consists of different types of glass, aberrations are corrected and all light rays focus at the same point.
The light then passes through the erector group which turns the image upright. The erector lenses once again have a focal point where the image is in perfect focus. From here the light passes through the ocular lens group into the eye.
In order to have any use as a sight, a riflescope must have sighting mechanism. In modern riflescopes it is the reticules or crosshairs, dot, or whatever reference points has been used.
The reticules must at all times be clearly visible to the shot. There are only two places inside a riflescope where a sharply focused image of the target at all times exists and those are the focal points of the objective and erector lens groups. These focal points are the only places where reticules can be installed in such a manner that both target and reticules are well focused and appear as clear images. Once the light has passed through all the riflescope lenses it reaches a point where the shot can see everything that has been reflected on the objective lens. This point is at the focal length of the ocular lens group, and the distance between this point and the ocular lens group is known as eye relief. Theoretically, this means that there is only one critical point behind a riflescope where a shot can place his eye and see a complete and clear image. In practice, aberration comes to the aid of the shot in this regard because all the light rays exiting from the ocular lens do not have the exact focal length. It is possible to move the eye slightly to the front or the rear of the focal plane and still see a satisfying image. This contributes to fast eye alignment and reduces aiming time, both of which are very important to the hunter.
Eye Relief
Eye relief is the distance at which you can see the full image view through the scope and determines how far behind the riflescope’s ocular (rear) lens the hunter will place his eye for optimum visibility. If you move your eye nearer or further back from the objective (rear) lens, the field of view begins to constrict. Insufficient (short) eye relief will force the hunter to hold his eye close to the riflescope and he can then be hurt when recoil slams the riflescope back into his face. Long eye relief enables the hunter to safely fire hard-recoiling riflescopes without risk of injury. Eye relief varies as magnification on a riflescope is adjusted. The higher one cranks the magnification up, the shorter the eye relief becomes.
The average eye relief for centerfire caliber riflescopes is about 3” (75mm). Riflescopes designed for big bore rifles normally have eye relief varying between 3.5” – 5” (90 – 127mm), and rimfire rifle riflescopes have only 2” (50mm).
Exit Pupil
The extent to which the light rays that fall on a riflescope’s objective lens can be concentrated depends on riflescope magnification, because the riflescope’s exit pupil is determined by dividing the objective lens diameter by the magnification of the riflescope.
A riflescope with a 4x magnification and an objective lens diameter of 40mm has a 10mm exit pupil (40 ÷ 4 = 10mm). In order to fully utilize a riflescope’s objective lens diameter, its resolving power must be sufficient to create an exit pupil with the exact diameter of the human pupil under the prevailing light conditions. To illustrate: A riflescope with a 40mm objective lens requires 7x – 8x magnification to fully utilize the 40mm of lens diameter, because in early morning and late afternoon light the human pupil has a diameter of 0.197”-0.236” (5 – 6 mm). For example: (40mm lens ÷ 7x magnification = 5,7mm exit pupil and 40 ÷ 8 = 5mm).
Optical tests conducted by the Americans during the Second World War established that the human eye can contract to ±0.1” (±2,5mm) in bright light. At dusk, with a light intensity of one candlelight (stated as a candela) the human pupil diameter is 0.197” (5mm).
Suppose you are hunting on a very clear day in bright sunshine and will most likely have a pupil diameter of ±.12” (3mm) and intend using a 4x magnification riflescope. The objective lens diameter will only have to be 0.472” (12mm – 3mm exit pupil x 4 magnification = 12mm). If the objective lens diameter is any larger it will pick up reflections and images under these conditions that the human pupil is unable to absorb.
But light conditions vary, and sometimes the light is poor. Under such conditions your pupil will expand to, say 0.236” (6mm). A 12mm objective lens will absorb insufficient light under such conditions to allow optimum vision, and such a riflescope will be useless, the reason being that the eye pupil of 6mm requires a 6mm exit pupil and a 24mm objective lens (6mm pupil diameter x 4 magnification = 24mm objective lens).
It is for the abovementioned reason that no modern riflescope sports a 12mm objective lens diameter. Another reason exists. A larger diameter exit pupil enables a shot to align his eye faster and easier, because his eye does not have to be exactly behind the centre of the riflescope’s ocular lens. The drawback of unused image whilst using large objective lenses is a small price to pay for the added convenience of better vision and ease of alignment.
Very view advantages in optics come free, and the convenience of a large exit pupil on a riflescope holds the disadvantage of parallax. More about that later.
Field of View
If a hunter holds his eye at the correct eye relief distance from the ocular lens, a cone of sight stretches from the eye pupil to the rim of the ocular lens. This cone forms an angle stretching from the lens rim on the one to the eye and back to the opposite side of the lens rim. This angle is the maximum angle that can be seen through the particular riflescope and is known as the field of view. Suppose a riflescope with a 6x magnification has a field of view of 24°. The visible field at 100 metres will be approximately 37 metres. Because this distance is magnified 6x (reduced) by the particular riflescope, one must divide the distance (37 metres) by 6x. The actual field of view at 100m then is 6,16m (20.2ft). Although it sounds logical to express a riflescope’s field of view in degrees, valid for all distances, most manufacturers express the field of view as one distance at another, for example, 12,8 metres at 100 metres. This system is more concrete and easier to grasp. It means that the shot will see an area of 12,8 m diameter at a distance of 100 metres. At 50 metres he will see 6,4m (half) and at 200 metres 25,6 metres (double).
A riflescope’s field of vision can be widened in three ways:
- The first is to reduce eye relief. The problem created by this method is that the aiming eye must be held to near to the ocular bell. Recoil can then cause injury when the scope is slammed into the shooter’s face.
- Another approach is to reduce magnification.
- The third and easiest solution is to simply increase ocular lens (rear lens) diameter.
Focal Plane & Reticule Position
Where reticules are placed in a riflescope affects the way in which they are perceived by the hunter. A reticule placed in front of the erector assembly (first focal plane) remains in the same visual proportion to the target across the riflescope’s entire range of magnification. The hunter will perceive this as a change in reticule thickness with changes in magnification. In reality the reticules are actually in proportion to the target. It is a system often found on European riflescopes and is not particularly liked in Africa and America, but provides good range-finding capability.
Reticules placed behind the erector assembly (second focal plane) will always stay the same size.
Fixed Power Riflescopes
Fixed power riflescopes are becoming increasingly scarcer as they do not offer the convenience of varying the magnification to suit the size of and distance to the target. Such riflescopes offer a singular magnification, but actually work very well.
Focusing Riflescopes
Not everybody has 20-20 vision and riflescopes must be adjustable to suit different eyes. Riflescope focus adjustment is effected by adjusting the ocular (rear) lens group.
Hunters without refraction errors can use a simple procedure to focus their riflescopes. Relax the eyes by looking at something distant without objects the eye can fix on, such as the cloudless sky. Turn the focus ring on the rear end of the riflescope fully to one side. Then bring the riflescope in position in front of the aiming eye and hold it at the same distance that it will be when shooting. Look THROUGH the riflescope and not at the reticules. If the reticules appear fussy or have a ghost image, adjust the ocular bell until they appear focused when executing the test. Do not keep the riflescope in front of the eye for more than a few seconds otherwise the eye will adapt. Then execute a half-turn on the adjustment ring and repeat the process until at some stage the reticules immediately appear sharp when the riflescope is peeked through.
Lens Coating
It is obvious that the more of the light that falls on the objective (front) lens that makes it out the ocular (rear) lens the better the hunter will see. A riflescope that only allows 60 % of the light that reflects on the objective lens to pass into the eye is not as good as one that allows 97% of such light to pass into the eye.
It is a well-known fact that glass does not allow all light that falls on its surface to come through. Approximately 4% of the light that falls on untreated glass is reflected at each surface where glass and air meet. This figure is equally valid for the surface where light enters glass than for the surface where it exits from glass. Because riflescopes easily contain ten lenses, 40% or more light can theoretically be lost in the process of passing through it.
The problem of light reflection and loss was largely solved by Professor Olexander Smakula (1900 – 1983) of the German firm Zeiss during the 1930s by coating lens surfaces with a thin layer of refractive fluoride and other chemicals. This process was extremely successful. These days, riflescope lenses are coated with numerous layers of chemicals, and some manufacturers claim light transmission through their riflescopes to be as high as 99%. Bear in mind that different light conditions and different eye conditions and colour-blindness levels cause hunters to experience different coatings differently. Some eyes react well to certain types of coating and others not.
Light Transmission – Relative Brightness of Riflescopes
The prospective riflescope purchaser should avail himself of two other terms – the Relative Brightness and the Twilight Factor of a riflescope. Otherwise he will be misled by the performance claimed for a riflescope in poor light conditions.
For many years most riflescope manufacturers published relative brightness indexes for their riflescopes, thereby propagating that a higher brightness factor meant better twilight performance. Relative brightness as a term bandied about is nothing but the square of the riflescope’s exit pupil diameter. The exit pupil diameter is, of course, the diameter of the light beam which exits from the ocular lens and can be determined by holding the riflescope at arm’s length. The bright spot visible on the ocular lens is the exit pupil. Because the exit pupil is determined by the amount of light which pass through the riflescope, it had incorrectly been accepted as a good method to determine a riflescope’s ability to function effectively in poor light. This is incorrect.
Simply put, the exit pupil of a riflescope can be increased by enlarging the objective lens diameter, as the exit pupil is the objective lens diameter divided by the riflescope’s magnification, i.e. 42mm (1,65″) lens diameter divided by 7x magnification = 6mm (0,236″) exit pupil. The brightness index of a riflescope with a 6mm exit pupil is 6×6 = 36. Another example is a 56mm (2,2″) lens diameter divided by 7x magnification which results in an 8mm (0,315″) and a brightness factor of 8×8 = 64. The latter’s relative brightness is 64 which is better than the 36, because the exit pupil is larger.
The relative brightness of two lenses with the same objective lens diameter will differ if their magnifications differ. For example, divide a 56mm lens by 8 magnification, and you will end up with a 7mm (0,275″) exit pupil. If you divide a 56mm lens diameter by 4X magnification it gives a 14mm (0,551″) exit pupil. The riflescope with the smaller magnification has the largest exit pupil and the square thereof will, naturally, also be the largest. Nobody can blame any hunter being under the impression that riflescopes with low magnification are better suited to low light conditions than high magnification.
The truth is that the pupil of the human eye can only open up to a certain extent: ±0.2” (±5mm) in hunting conditions. At that aperture the eye can, like a camera, only absorb and utilize a certain amount of light, being of 0.2” (5mm) diameter. A large diameter light beam cannot penetrate the pupil. Just like a 4” (100mm) pipe cannot accommodate all the water from an 8” (200mm) pipe in the same time without increasing pressure. Riflescopes cannot increase light’s pressure. So, the relative brightness figure is a useless consideration when evaluating a riflescope intended for twilight use and hunters should not be misled by it.
Light Transmission – Twilight Factor of Riflescopes
A riflescope with a high magnification is better suited to poor light conditions because it shows more detail. This is proved and measured by the so-called twilight factor (TF). The twilight factor is determined by multiplying the objective lens diameter with the riflescope’s magnification and then determining its square root.
| Example 1 | TF = √ | lens diameter x magnification | ||
| TF = √ | 32 x 4 | |||
| TF = √ | 128 | |||
| TF = | 11,3 | |||
| Example 2 | TF = √ | lens diameter x magnification | ||
| TF = √ | 32 x 8 | |||
| TF = √ | 256 | |||
| TF = | 16 | |||
The riflescope in example 2 has a higher twilight factor and is therefore better suited to hunting in poor light. What it all boils down to is that a larger objective lens diameter or a higher magnification are both positive factors in poor light.
Objective Lens Diameter
The size or diameter of a riflescopes objective lens is governed by the wave theory of light. Light rays move from one point to another in a wave pattern, like ripples in a pool. This causes the outline of an image to become somewhat hazy, almost as if the object is vibrating.
Because of this vibration it is, practically speaking, virtually impossible to observe an absolute perfect point image of any object through a lens. Each point of an image consists of a spot of light with a diffraction ring surrounding it. This ring is called the Airy disc. The only solution is to increase lens size, thereby admitting a greater area of the wave front and then to concentrate the same tightly for better visual resolution. This can be illustrated by drawing something on a large scale. By reducing its size, certain detail is lost, yet it shows more detail then would have been the case had it initially been drawn on a small scale. In the case of lenses this can only be achieved by using objective lenses with a larger diameter.
In order to use the image reflected on the riflescope’s objective lens, the light must penetrate the eye. The light that penetrates the eye must be concentrated in a beam with a diameter not exceeding normal pupil diameter, that being 0.275” (7mm) in pitch darkness and about 0.197” (5mm) in light suitable for hunting. If this image beam (exit pupil) is larger than the pupil, the eye will be unable to see the whole image reflected on the objective lens.
Parallax
Parallax is normally defined as the apparent displacement of an object relative to another because of a shift in the point from which the object is viewed.
This can be practically illustrated with the same example used to determine the dominant eye of a shot – with minor adaptions. Stretch an arm with the hand in the classical hiking gesture out in front of the head, simultaneously aligning the thumb with an object a few metres away whilst keeping one eye closed. Switch eyes without moving the hand or head at all. The thumb will not be lined up with the object anymore. Yet neither the thumb nor the object has moved. It is just the point or angle of observation that has changed. If the thumb is held against the object the apparent movement, because of different observation points, will be minimal or non- existent.
Parallax is one of those terms that baffle most hunters simply because it sounds complicated. In reality, the aspects regarding parallax that the hunter has to master are few and relatively simple, as it is unnecessary to understand or use any mathematical means.
The existence of parallax in all riflescopes is easily determined. Place a riflescope on a solid rest and aim it at an object about ten metres off. Then move the aiming eye horizontally to and fro behind the scope. The reticules will appear to move relative to the point of aim. Yet it is not the case. Once again it is merely the point of observation that moves.
From this we can deduct that if the aiming eye pupil is not exactly aligned with the centre of the exit pupil of the light rays, an angle is created between the eye’s line of sight and the axis of the light moving through the riflescope. This causes parallax and results in a point of impact differing from the point of aim indicated by the reticules to the off-center aiming eye.
This error is so slight that it can be ignored during short-distance hunting. The effect is more pronounced across longer ranges. A long-range hunter normally has sufficient time to align his eye properly, thereby eliminating parallax. For this reason it is important to choose a riflescope with a small exit pupil for long-distance use. Even though the manufacturer claims it to be parallax-free, it is not parallax-free over all distances. That is why a parallax adjustment feature has been introduced on riflescopes to be used at long range. If hunting distances are short or hunting conditions of such a nature that aiming time will be short, riflescopes with larger exit pupils will offer an advantage.
Although the time parallax and its effect are now understood, it remains necessary to explain the reason for its existence.
At the discussion of erector lenses it was stated that the reticules must be placed at the focal length of these lenses to present a clear image of target and reticules, and to place both on the same visual plane.
We all know that a magnifying glass must be held a specific distance from an object in order to present the clearest image to the eye. In layman’s terms it can be said that the moment the magnifying glass is moved away from that point, the focal length does not coincide with the viewer’s eye and the image blurs. A riflescope has the same effect. Because the reticules cannot be moved around in the scope due to design, it follows that the lenses must be calibrated to form their focal points at the reticule position. This, on the other hand, means that the relevant lens group can only be a specific distance away from the target.
Riflescope manufacturers, therefore, choose an arbitrary distance for the target according to where the lenses are calibrated to have the correct focal length. In riflescopes intended for centerfire hunting rifles this distance normally is 100 metres or 100 yards.
The hunter virtually never finds a target at exactly the distance his riflescope is calibrated for and so the focal point inside the riflescope does not form exactly at the desired point where the reticules are situated. This results in the reticules and the image not being on the same plane. The same phenomenon as with the thumb example occurs when the point of observation is moved. Parallax occurs. The nearer the distance between the target and the relevant lens is to the arbitrary 100 metres, the nearer to the desired point the focal point forms and the smaller parallax becomes. The further beyond 100 metres the target stands the progressively more pronounced parallax again becomes.
Some riflescopes, especially high magnification target and silhouette riflescopes being used over known distances, are fitted with an external adjustment ring on the objective bell or a parallax adjustment knob on the turret. This enables the shot to focus the riflescope for each distance over which the riflescope is used in order to eliminate parallax.
Rangefinding Reticules
These riflescopes were originally developed for the military and originally employed a so-called mil-dot system in terms of which the sniper bracketed his target between the cross on the scope reticule and a series of dots, and then calculated the range to the target. It is quite accurate.
Civilians generally do not take the trouble to master the mil-dot system and a variety of simpler systems have been developed for them. This ranges from bracketing animal bodies between sets of lines to a variety of other systems. The advent of portable laser rangefinders has largely eliminated the need for this kind of system, but it remains popular for some reason.
Resolving Power – Human Eye
The resolving power of the average human eye is about one minute, or a 16th°, which means that a normal and healthy human eye can distinguish an object (say blocks on a chessboard) of about 1” (25,4mm) in diameter at 100 yards. If the chess board is moved further afield, the human eye will find it progressively more difficult to distinguish each square until a point is reached where the chessboard will appear grey.
Resolving Power (Magnification) – Riflescopes
The resolving power of a riflescope is the relationship between the riflescope’s magnification and the human eye’s resolving power. A riflescope with a 4x magnification will enable the human eye looking through it to distinguish a square (or any object for that matter) over four times the distance the naked eye is able to. Put differently: Over any given distance such a riflescope will enable the shot to distinguish a square a quarter of the size that the naked eye can. The ability of any riflescope to distinguish an object and its details depends on:
- The type of glass used;
- The quality of such glass;
- The degree to which aberrations have been corrected;
- The diameter of the objective lens.
As a result of modern technology there is a large number of types of optical glass in existence, each with its own properties. Quality and uniformity of the end product depends on the ability of the manufacturer to maintain batch-to-batch consistency.
Trajectory Compensating Riflescopes
See Ballistic Turrets above. Such riflescopes are specifically designed to change the point of impact according to the distances over which the shooting is done. These riflescopes contain certain distance settings. In other words, it is adjustable for distances like 100m, 200m, 300m and so forth. Such a riflescope is sighted in at say 100m and can then be calibrated to be on target at any of the other distance settings when adjusted.
Variable (Power) Riflescopes
A variable power riflescope offers the hunter a range of enlargements (magnification options). If he hunts at close range or large animals, the hunter can reduce the magnification and, if the animal is small or distant, he can increase the magnification to see the target much more enlarged.
Determining the Correct Group Center
By Pierre van der Walt
While one can often get away with a rough estimate of the actual center of a fired group on a target and adjust accordingly relying somewhat on trial-and-error, there are instances such as open sight adjustment, when the exact statistically correct center of the group has to be determined. That center of the group is not in the middle of the bullet holes the furthest apart horizontally and vertically.
When you really need to be accurate you obviously have to start with a fouling shot not aimed at the target reference. Once the barrel has been fouled, you then fire your group, but it has to consist of at least 5 shots for moderate statistical validity. A 3-shot group is useless for this purpose. Once the group has been fired you draw a vertical line (AA in our example) through the left-most bullet hole if the group is on the left of the target, or through the right-most bullet hole if the group is to the right of the aiming point. Also draw a horizontal line through the bottom bullet hole if the group is above the aiming point, or through the top hole if it is below the aiming point. (BB in our example.)
Determining Horizontal Center
| Step 1 | Total the Deviations from the AA Reference Line | |||
| Shot 1 | = | 0.000” | (0,00mm) | |
| Shot 2 | = | 1.044” | (26,5mm) | |
| Shot 3 | = | 1.119” | (28,4mm) | |
| Shot 4 | = | 0.747” | (18,8mm) | |
| Shot 5 | = | 1.284” | (32,6mm) | |
| TOTAL | = | 4.194” | (106,3mm) | |
| Step 2 | Divide the Total for an Average Deviation | |||
| 4.194” | ÷ | 5 shots | = 0.8388” | |
| 106,3mm | ÷ | 5 shots | = 21,36mm | |
| Step 3 | Mark the Center Line | |||
| Draw a Vertical Line XH 0.8388” to the right of line AA. That constitutes the statistical horizontal group center. | ||||
| Step 4 | Measure Correction | |||
| Measure distance between XH and the aiming point to determine correction required. In our example it is 0.863” (21,9mm) indicated by the horizontal green arrow. | ||||
| Determining Vertical Center | ||||
| Step 5 | Total the Deviations from the BB Reference Line | |||
| Shot 1 | = | 0.836” | ( 21,2mm) | |
| Shot 2 | = | 1.867” | ( 47,4mm) | |
| Shot 3 | = | 0.000” | ( 00,0mm) | |
| Shot 4 | = | 1.492” | ( 37,9mm) | |
| Shot 5 | = | 1.192” | (30,3mm) | |
| TOTAL | = | 5,387” | (136,8mm) | |
| Step 6 | Divide the Total for an Average Deviation | |||
| 5.387” | ÷ | 5 shots | = 1.0774” | |
| 136,8mm | ÷ | 5 shots | = 27,4mm | |
| Step 7 | Mark the Center Line | |||
| Draw a Horizontal Line XV1.0774” above line BB. That constitutes the statistical vertical group center | ||||
| Step 8 | Measure Correction | |||
| Measure distance between XV and the aiming point to determine downward correction required. In our example it is 1.5934” (40,5mm) indicated by the vertical green arrow. | ||||
| Answer | X Marks the Spot | |||
| The intersection point (X) is the actual center of this group. One can now adjust very precisely and save on ammo and time. | ||||
This method is particularly important when intending to drift open sights. The formula for open sight drifting is provided in the article: Open Sight Adjustment & Formula.
The History of Riflescopes
By Pierre van der Walt
The Arabs pioneered the development of the telescope and had already manufactured telescopes in the eleventh century. This knowledge was lost somehow during the Middle Ages, probably due to the Crusades.
A Dutchman, Zacharias Janssen (1588 – 1630) rediscovered the knowledge during the 16thcentury.The news spread across Europe and by 1609 commenced building telescopes in earnest. By using a concave as well as a concave lens Galilei succeeded in viewing Jupiter’s moons. The lens combination furnishes an upright image and the system has since become known as the Galilian system.The German scientist Johannes Kepler (1571 – 1630) used convex lenses in both the objective and ocular positions. This provided a much larger field of view than the Galilian system, but the image with the Kepler system is not only inverted but hind part foremost as well.
Telescopes were installed on rifles for sighting purposes during the 17thcentury. The first reference to scopes on rifles is found in Francesco Lana de Terzi’s (1631 – 1687) Magister Naturae et Artis of 1684. King Frederick the Great of Prussia noted in 1737 that he had fired a telescoped rifle. Riflescopes naturally were very expensive and, therefore, gained little commercial acceptance for centuries. It was more popular (especially on sniping rifles) in Europe than anywhere else in the world, mainly because the necessary know-how was centered in Europe at the time.
The breakthrough came when the American, William “Bill” Ralph Weaver (1905 – 1975) succeeded during the early 1930s to manufacture and market rifle telescopes at an affordable price. Bill Weaver had no formal optical training and taught himself the technical aspects of riflescopes. He first manufactured a riflescope in 1931 and founded the W.R. Weaver Company at El Paso Texas during 1933 to manufacture affordable riflescopes. Weaver’s first riflescopes were not manufactured in Texas but in Newport, Kentucky, and were substantially smaller, lighter and much cheaper than their European counterparts, and became an immediate success.
Weaver experienced several serious problems. Virtually no gunsmith knew how to mount a riflescope onto a rifle. Production rifles of the period were not equipped with holes drilled and tapped for riflescope installation. Weaver had to mount all the riflescopes he had sold himself and soon realized that it was impossible. To overcome the problem he toured America training gunsmiths. As time progressed gunsmiths gradually took the burden off his shoulders, allowing him time to lavish his attentions on his primary enterprise. Rifle manufacturers also started drilling and tapping their rifles for riflescope mounting. Today we take these things for granted and mandatory, and it is hard to imagine a time when it had not been the case.
Weaver not only succeeded in making the riflescope available and affordable to the average man, but he initiated a brand-new industry and, in the process, selling more riflescopes by the time he died than any other rifle manufacturer in the history. The company fell on hard times and Weaver was forced to sell it in 1968. This process repeated itself for a number of years until it was sold to the ATK Sporting group that also owns Federal Premium, Alliant Powder, RCBS, CCI, Fusion, Speer Ammo, Speer Bullets, Estate Cartridge and Blazer.
Another factor that troubled Weaver was the shape of the bolt handles of the rifles available at the time. The shape prevented bolt manipulation once a riflescope had been installed, as most protruded rather sharply from the bolt shaft. He solved the problem by either mounting the riflescope far enough ahead of the bolt handle’s path to allow the handle to pass behind the ocular bell, or he altered the bolt so that it could pass underneath the riflescope. The latter option became the more popular and nowadays virtually all manufacturers design their rifles to allow normal operation, even with a riflescope in place.
Adjusting riflescopes was a problem in itself. Most riflescopes were internally adjustable for elevation only. Adjustments were not calibrated and no pre-determined adjustments were provided on the early riflescopes. Windage could only be adjusted externally. In other words, the vertical crosshair could not be adjusted. The entire riflescope had to be moved sideways at the rear mount and this caused problems. The riflescope was firmly clamped in the front ring and any lateral adjustment of the rear part of the riflescope bent the riflescope. Bending it, placed the tube as well as the lenses and seals under stress,often resulting in breakages. Apart from that, it had a detrimental effect on the path which the light rays followed through the riflescope.
Mounting holes were seldom perfectly aligned, resulting is slightly askew base positions. Manufacturing tolerances resulted in variances in the height differences between receiver and bridge. Reticules in the early riflescopes were only in the rarest of cases exactly centered in the riflescope image. Shims were used to offset such errors and to move the reticules nearer to the centers of the image seen through a riflescope. In due course the permanently centered reticule made its debut. This development compensates for slight installation errors whilst keeping the reticule intersection in the exact centre of the field of view. It would be an understatement to say that permanently centered reticules was one of the most important and welcome steps in the development of the riflescope.
At the outbreak of the Second World War American riflescopes had become adjustable on both planes. This was not the case with European riflescopes, though. Today we are fortunate in that apart from having riflescopes which are internally adjustable on both planes, we also have adjustable mounts which allow lateral movement of the riflescope’s rear without warping it. Minute and extremely accurate adjustments are, therefore, possible nowadays.
The History of Rifle Sights
By Pierre van der Walt
The firearms of the early 14th century were so inaccurate that any form of sighting, apart from merely pointing the arm in the direction of the target before firing, was unnecessary. Accuracy, however, soon improved to such an extent that more efficient sighting methods became mandatory. Firearms were consequently equipped with primitive sights since ±1450.
Bead & Notch Sights
These early sights merely comprised a bead at the muzzle and a fixed standing leaf with a notch situated somewhat to the rear. The beads were initially made of iron, but during the 16th century brass made its appearance as a front sight material on cheap guns. Silver made its appearance on luxury rifles more or less at the same time. Initially, front sights were simply screwed into the barrel. Sometimes it was placed on a base which in turn slid into a transverse dovetail on the top of the barrel. Windage adjustments were made by driving the front sight sideways in the desired direction. Initially the sight arrangement was situated on the very tip of the barrel, right at the muzzle, but it was soon found to be too vulnerable and was moved slightly rearwards. The rear sight, sometimes on a base as well, was normally placed at a point about 320mm (12,5") in front of the eyes of the shot when in the aiming stance. This worked quite well and gave a well-focused image. Reference marks soon appeared on either the barrel or the base to improve ease of adjustment. It did not take long before the appearance of rear sight blades of varying heights which could be flicked into position for use over increasing distances.
Peep Sights & Ghost Rings
An interesting variation on the theme originated in Turkey. Instead of the bead-and-blade set-up the Turks introduced the peep sight. A series of peep-holes were drilled vertically in the rear sight blade, the one on top of the other. Each different peep-hole was used over a different distance. This rugged system became extremely popular in the Middle East and North Africa, and was even used on European military rifles well into the nineteenth century. The only difference was that the European system used only one peep hole, and elevation adjustments were effected by moving the rear sight to a specified higher position on a ramp. The European system is still in use on virtually every military rifle available today in the large hole (ghost ring) configuration.
Rear Sight Development
By 1500 the rear sight sometimes consisted of two parallel panels placed lengthwise on the barrel about 5mm (1/5") apart. A lead slab with a V-shaped notch lay between the panels. Somewhere between 1525 and 1550 the panels became a tube and the whole set-up acquired the appearance of a short, glassless telescope equipped with a notched leaf sight rather than a reticule. During the seventeenth century the tube was replaced by a solid block through which a peephole had been drilled. The sight was, in some instances, even equipped with a screw to accomplish windage adjustments. German and Scandinavian rifles dating from the latter part of the sixteenth and the early seventeenth century used a system that consisted of a slot cut into the top of the barrel. This slot stretched backwards from the front sight right up to the breach. The slot’s function was to focus the attention of the eye on the bead. A variation on the theme made its debut in Germany where they fitted a flat or triangular rib on top of the barrel. This system became very popular in Denmark, disappeared and re-emerged for a short period in Germany during the eighteenth century, after which it never appeared again. Wingshooting became very popular during the seventeenth century. This necessitated the re-introduction of the V-notch, but this time the French introduced it in a wide V configuration. The wide V degenerated in some areas into the buckhorn sight. Despite the fact that this blade shape became popular in America, it is totally impractical. A new trend in sight fitting made its appearance during about 1660. Instead of affixing the sight to the barrel itself, sights were fitted to a barrel band which was then in turn sweated to the barrel at the desired spot. This system remained quite popular until the mid-18th century.
Fully Adjustable Sights
The quest for better sights continued during the nineteenth century, especially after the appearance of the Minié rifle. Rifles were soon equipped with finely adjustable sights. Until the mid-nineteenth century all rear sights were either of the V-notch or the peep type. About that time the famous singer and shooter, Ira Albert Paine (1837 – 1898) replaced the V-notch with a U-notch. During 1898 another American pistol shot, E.E. Patridge developed yet another sight and notch shape. His system consisted of a flat-topped pillar acting as front sight combined with a rectangular notch in the rear sight blade. The notch was made wide enough to allow light to pass another side of the pillar when viewed through the notch, making it very simple to allow for windage. The Patridge system to this day remains the most popular on handguns and firearms intended for target shooting.
Open Sight Adjustment & Formula
By Pierre van der Walt
To adjust open sights follow the procedure explained below.
| Step 1 | Determine the Correct Group Center and Deviation | |
| In the article Determining the Correct Group Center we have used an example where the statistically correct center of a 5-shot group fired at 50 yards was determined. In that example the center of the group was 0.863” (21,9mm) to the left of the aiming point and 1.5934” (40,5mm) too high. This means the group center has to move right and down. | ||
| Step 2 | Measure the Distance Between Sights | |
| The next step is to measure the distances between the face of the rear sight blade and the face of the front sight. Let’s make it 8.976” (228mm) for our purposes. The distance between the front sight and the target is important as well. For this example we take it as 50 yards (1,800” or 45 720mm). | ||
| Step 3 | Apply the Adjustment Formula | |
| The formula to adjust (drift) the rear sight for corrections is: | ||
| M = (R x E) ÷ D | M is the rear sight movement (unknown) | |
| R is the sight radius: 8.976” (228mm) | ||
| E is desired change of impact point: 0.863” (21,9mm) | ||
| D the distance between front sight and target: 1,800” (45 720mm) | ||
| Example: Imperial | Metric | |
| M = (R x E) ÷ D | M = (R x E) ÷ D | |
| M = (8.976” x 0.863”) ÷ 1,800” | M = (228mm x 21,9mm) ÷ 91 440mm | |
| M = 0.004303” | M = 0.109213mm | |
| Step 4 | Apply the Calculation | |
| The rear sight has to be moved 0.004303” (0.109213mm) in the same direction than the center of the fired group has to move to coincide with the initial point of aim. In our example that is to the right. | ||

The very same method can be used to determine how much the rear sight has to be lowered to achieve the correct lowering of the point of impact.
PH Schools in South Africa
| Eastern Cape Academy of Professional Hunting | |
| Director : | Jacques Greeff |
| Address : | P.O. Box 89 |
| Adelaide | |
| 5760 | |
| Tel : | 046 645 2713 |
| Fax : | 046 645 2713 |
| Mobile : | 082 925 4526 |
| Email : | jgreeff@eastcape.net |
| Website : | www.ecgma.co.za/professional_hunting.aspx |
| Spring Valley School of Professional Hunting | |
| Director : | Chappie Scott |
| Address : | P.O. Box 80 |
| Tarkastad | |
| 5370 | |
| Tel : | 045 848 0104 |
| Fax : | 045 848 0103 |
| Mobile : | 083 305 1950 |
| Email : | info@scottofafrica.co.za |
| Website : | www.scottofafrica.co.za/professional-hunting-school |
Free State
The courses of most Professional Hunting Academies are recognized by the Free State authorities. As is the case with all other provinces, students have to write an exam on Free State conservation and hunting legislation to obtain a licence for that province.
Gauteng
| Kobus Schoeman Hunting Academy | |
| Director : | Kobus Schoeman |
| Address : | P.O. Box 105 |
| Bronkhorstspruit | |
| 1020 | |
| Tel : | 013 932 3768 |
| Fax : | 013 932 3768 |
| Mobile : | 082 890 6058 |
| Email : | kobussch@penta-net.co.za |
| Website : | http://www.kssafaris.com |
KwaZulu-Natal
Limpopo
| Game Hunters Professional Hunting School | |
| Director : | Gerhard Steenkamp |
| Address : | P.O. Box 5757 |
| Onverwacht | |
| 0557 | |
| Tel : | 014 763 5299 |
| Fax: | 014 763 5299 |
| Mobile : | 082 561 4681 |
| Email : | gamehunt@xsinet.co.za |
| Website : | www.huntingschool.co.za |
| Limpopo Wildlife Training | |
| Director : | Zeriah Steyn |
| Address : | P.O. Box 1010 |
| Mussina | |
| 0900 | |
| Tel : | 071 228 9437 |
| Fax : | 086 685 2123 |
| Mobile : | 079 682 9109 |
| Email : | limpopowt@gmail.com |
| Website : | – |
| SA National Professional Hunting School | |
| Director : | Melville du Plessis |
| Address : | P.O. Box 4577 |
| Mokopane | |
| 0600 | |
| Tel : | 015 453 0780 |
| Fax : | 015 453 0780 |
| Mobile : | 082 685 7313 |
| Email : | bwanamel@yahoo.com |
| Website : | http://www.bwanamel.com |
| Southern African Wildlife College | |
| CEO : | Theresa Sowry |
| Board Chair : | Dr David Mabunda (SANParks) |
| Address : | Private Bag X3015 |
| Hoedspruit | |
| 1380 | |
| Tel : | 015 793 7300 |
| Fax : | 015 793 7314 |
| Email : | info@sawc.org.za |
| Website : | www.wildlifecollege.org.za |
| Sutherland Hunting Academy | |
| Director : | David Sutherland |
| Address : | P.O. Box 888 |
| Vaalwater | |
| 0530 | |
| Tel : | 083-325 8956 |
| Fax : | 086 514 1506 |
| Mobile : | 083 325 8956 |
| Email : | david@huntacademy.co.za |
| Website : | www.huntacademy.co.za |
Mpumalanga
The courses of most Professional Hunting Academies are recognized by the Mpumalanga State authorities. As is the case with all other provinces, students have to write an exam on Mpumalanga conservation and hunting legislation to obtain a licence for that province.
Gauteng. Director David Sutherland of the Sutherland Hunting Academy in Limpopo used to be the Assistant Director, Professional Hunting and Policy with the Mpumalanga Parks Board.
North West
| Ultimate Adventures | |
| Director : | Pierre Erasmus |
| Address : | P.O. Box 1301 |
| Mooinooi | |
| 0325 | |
| Tel : | |
| Fax : | 086 669 6191 |
| Mobile : | 083 625 4736 |
| Email : | pierre@internext.co.za |
| Website : | – |
N-Cape
| Northern Cape Professional Hunting School | |
| Director : | Mynhard Herholdt |
| Address : | P.O. Box 13 |
| Vanderkloof | |
| 8771 | |
| Tel: | – |
| Fax : | 053 664 0047 |
| Mobile : | 083 262 1891 |
| Email : | mhhs@mweb.co.za |
| Website : | www.ncph.co.za |
W-Cape
| Belmont Professional Hunting Academy | |
| Director : | Andre Viljoen |
| Address : | P.O. Box 576 |
| Ceres | |
| 6835 | |
| Tel : | 023 312 1695 |
| Fax : | 023 312 1695 |
| Mobile : | 083 700 7965 |
| Email : | besthunt@mweb.co.za |
| Website : | www.besthunt.co.za |
PH Schools in Tanzania
| College of African Wildlife, Mweka | |
| Rector : | Dr. Freddy S. Manongi |
| Address : | P.O.Box 3031, Moshi |
| Tanzania | |
| Tel : | +255-27-275 6451 |
| Fax : | +255-73-297 5568 |
| Mobile : | +255-78-767 9920 |
| Email : | mweka@mwekawildlife.org |
| Website : | www.mwekawildlife.org |















