Bucket List Trip to South Africa

By Rick Hearden

 

On February 25, 2020, my good friend Ron Hugo, owner of A-Fox Hunting in Abrams, Wisconsin, invited me to an event at his home to meet Ken Whiley from Gamka Safaris in South Africa. Ken gave a presentation about his hunting safaris, and from the moment he started talking, I was hooked. I had been hunting Whitetail Deer, Mule Deer, and Elk in the United States since I was 12 years old and had enjoyed countless hunts with family and friends. But this was different. The scenery, the wildlife, and the adventure of hunting in Africa looked incredible.

 

The only question was who would go with me and when we would make it happen.

 

As life often does, it got in the way. Plans were made and postponed several times. Then, six years later, my longtime friend Bob Toonen finally said, “Let’s do it.” Bob is a serious hunter who owns nearly 1,000 acres of prime hunting land in Buffalo County, Wisconsin—Whitetail Deer heaven. If there was anyone I wanted to share an African adventure with, it was Bob.

 

Ron booked the trip through Gamka Safaris, and on April 30, 2026, we left Green Bay, Wisconsin, for South Africa. By then, Ken had retired and turned the business over to his partner, Albert Swart. I had never met Albert, but Ron assured us we would love him. Thankfully, he was right.

 

 Cape Town

Cape of Good Hope.

Drive along False Bay.

Our first stop was Cape Town for three nights before heading north for the hunting portion of the trip. Neither Bob nor I had ever been to South Africa – or Africa for that matter. We arrived to rainy weather, but our first experience was excellent. An employee from Afton House met us at the airport and helped us through the arrival process. Since we chose to use rifles supplied by Gamka rather than bring our own, customs was quick and easy. For anyone considering a similar trip, I highly recommend leaving your rifles at home and using those provided by your outfitter.

 

Waiting outside was our driver and guide, Graham Haywood, who quickly became more friend than chauffeur. We checked into Afton House, a beautiful guesthouse operated by Tony and Marika Futter. After a long journey, we were happy to settle in, enjoy a wonderful dinner, and spend the evening getting to know our hosts. The accommodations were comfortable, clean, and spacious, and we enjoyed a great first night’s sleep. The next morning, after breakfast, Graham drove us along the coast toward Seal Island. Bob and I had decided that if we were coming all the way to South Africa, we were getting in a shark cage.

Bob and Rick at Cape Shark Adventures.

Off the coast of Seal Island.

Copper shark.

The plan was to see Great White Sharks, but we quickly learned they have largely disappeared from the area. The most popular theory is that Orcas have moved in and driven them away by preying on them. While there were no Great Whites, we still had an unforgettable experience. We climbed into the cage and came face-to-face with several large Copper Sharks. They were aggressive and exciting to watch, but fortunately not interested in turning us into lunch.

 

Afterward, Graham took us on one of the most scenic drives I have ever experienced. We followed the coastline back toward Cape Town with spectacular views of the Atlantic Ocean and dramatic cliffs. At one point, I reminded Graham he should probably keep his eyes on the road so Bob and I could enjoy the scenery safely.

 

Later, Graham convinced us to visit South Africa’s famous wine country. We traveled to Stellenbosch and visited Uva Mira Mountain Vineyards. I am not much of a wine drinker, but even I had to admit the wine was excellent. Bob enjoyed it so much that he purchased four cases to ship home. He promised me a bottle when it arrived. I’m still waiting.

 

After a wonderful dinner in Stellenbosch, we returned to Afton House for another relaxing evening. Our third day was more laid-back. We drove south to the Cape of Good Hope and enjoyed beautiful weather with temperatures around 70 degrees. Along the way we saw baboons, mountains, vineyards, and stunning coastal views.

 

Since South Africa is known for its diamonds and Tanzanite, Graham arranged a visit to a private jewelry dealer in Cape Town. Let’s just say some purchases were made, although I’ll leave the details out.

 

That evening, we watched the sunset from high above the city. Cape Town is truly one of the most beautiful places I have ever seen. Between the mountains, the ocean, and the city itself, the views were unforgettable.

 

After another excellent dinner, we returned to Afton House to prepare for the next phase of our adventure.

Afton Cape Town.

Into the Karoo

 

On May 5th, Albert Swart met us at the airport in George. Within minutes, it was obvious why Ron had spoken so highly of him. The drive north to our hunting destination took us through spectacular mountain passes and breathtaking scenery. After stopping in Beaufort West, we continued to a 62,000-acre game ranch nestled among the mountains. Our accommodations were called Little London, and the setting was incredible.

Campfire at Little London.

Even on the drive into camp we saw zebras, giraffes, Cape kudu, springbok, gemsbok, fallow deer, and rhebok. Unfortunately, shortly after arriving, the rain started—and it didn’t stop for a day and a half. This was unusual for the season, but weather is one thing nobody can control.

 

The storms were severe enough that the day after we traveled through the beautiful Franschhoek Pass, flash floods washed out major portions of the road.

 

Fortunately, camp life was fantastic. Albert was an outstanding host. My Professional Hunter, Gerald Middleton, was exceptional, and Albert’s partner, Jolene, kept us well-fed with incredible meals. We spent the rainy days eating, drinking, laughing, and sharing stories while waiting for the weather to improve.

 

Finally, the sun came out. It was time to hunt.

Day One

 

Bob got on the board first with a mature Red Hartebeest. Meanwhile, Gerald, our tracker Wayne, and I spent the morning stalking Springbok and Gemsbok through muddy conditions without success. After several miles of hiking, we had nothing to show for our efforts except muddy boots.

 

The afternoon turned everything around. While driving near a swollen creek bed, we encountered a herd of Red Hartebeest. After manoeuvring into position, Gerald pointed out the largest bull. My first shot connected, and after a brief repositioning, a second shot dropped him for good. My first African animal. What a feeling.

 

Less than two hours later, things became even more exciting.

 

A trophy Cape Kudu appeared near our truck. Gerald tracked him while Wayne and I prepared for a shot. When the kudu finally paused and looked back, I took the opportunity. The shot was good, and after a short search we recovered him.

 

I stood there in disbelief.

Rick and Gerald’s Gemsbok.

Bob’s Red Hartebeest.

Bob’s Blue Wildebeest.

Within ninety minutes, I had harvested both a trophy Red Hartebeest and a trophy Cape Kudu. The kudu carried beautiful 45½-inch horns and represented one of the animals I most wanted to bring home. The morning’s frustrations had completely disappeared.

 

That evening we celebrated with drinks, great food, and plenty of stories around the dinner table.

 

Day Two

 

The next morning, Bob and Albert headed to another property in pursuit of a Sable. Gerald and I focused on my second bucket-list animal: a Gemsbok. We located a large herd early but were detected before we could get into position. Watching thirty Gemsbok disappear into the distance was both impressive and frustrating.

 

Eventually, Gerald spotted a lone bull. A trophy.

 

Using the terrain and every bush available for cover, we carefully worked our way closer. When the opportunity came, my first shot struck slightly higher than intended and hit the neck. The bull retreated.

Rick’s Gemsbok.

We repositioned quickly and eventually found him resting. This time, I settled in and made a perfect shot through the heart.

 

Success. The Gemsbok carried thick 34½-inch horns and was one of the animals I had dreamed about hunting since first seeing Ken Whiley’s presentation years earlier.

 

At that point, I had already harvested the two animals I most wanted.

 

Everything else would be a bonus. The bonuses came quickly.

 

Later that afternoon we spotted two mature Springbok rams. Gerald identified one as exceptional. At approximately 200 yards, I squeezed the trigger, and the ram dropped instantly. When we reached him, Gerald simply shook his head.

 

That evening Albert told me he had harvested over 1,500 Springbok during his career and had never taken one larger. The ram carried 15-inch horns and was significantly larger than average.

 

Not bad for my first Springbok. Meanwhile, Bob successfully harvested an outstanding Sable, often called the Prince of Africa. It was a beautiful trophy and a tremendous accomplishment.

Day Three

 

The following morning, Bob continued searching for a Kudu and Gemsbok while Gerald and I looked for an Impala, an animal that to me simply looks like Africa.

 

After several hours of searching, we had seen plenty of wildlife but no mature Impala ram. Then, while driving through thick brush, I noticed what looked like two reddish-brown animals hidden among the vegetation.

 

At first, I assumed they were Blesbok. Gerald took a closer look and immediately got excited.

 

“Holy cow,” he said. “That’s a trophy Red Lechwe.”

 

We quickly got into position and waited for the ram to separate from a female. When the opportunity came, one well-placed shot through the heart ended the hunt.

 

The Red Lechwe carried beautiful 24½-inch horns and became another unexpected highlight of the trip. By now I had far exceeded every expectation I brought to Africa.

 

Back at camp, Bob returned with another excellent trophy—a Blue Wildebeest. While he was still searching for his Kudu and Gemsbok, the Wildebeest was a fantastic addition to his safari.

 

That evening I decided my giant Springbok needed a friend. The next day’s goal would be a Black Springbok.

 

Final Day

Rick’s Black Springbok.

For our last hunting day, Gerald arranged access to a neighboring property. Within minutes of arriving, we spotted several herds of Springbok. Before long, Gerald identified a mature Black Springbok among them.

 

At approximately 185 yards, I settled in for the shot. One trigger pull. Success.

 

The Black Springbok was a beautiful animal and the perfect way to finish an unforgettable safari. In roughly three days of hunting, I had harvested six outstanding trophies:

  • Red Hartebeest
  • Cape Kudu
  • Gemsbok
  • Common Springbok
  • Red Lechwe
  • Black Springbok

 

It truly was the hunting trip of a lifetime.

 

Reflections

Rick & Bob’s Red Hartebeests.

Gerald carrying My Springbok.

Bob’s Sable.

Rick’s Springbok.

Although Bob never connected on the Kudu or Gemsbok he hoped for, he returned home with an exceptional Red Hartebeest, Sable, and Blue Wildebeest.

 

Together, we brought home trophies beyond our expectations and memories that will last forever.

 

Yet the animals tell only part of the story. What made this trip truly special were the people. The hospitality of Tony, Marika, and Graham in Cape Town.  The friendship and professionalism of Albert Swart. The incredible skill of Gerald Middleton, whose ability to spot animals remains the best I have ever seen. The amazing meals prepared by Jolene. The opportunity provided by Michael Allsop to hunt his spectacular 62,000-acre ranch.

 

Most of all, it was the experience itself – the scenery, the wildlife, the camaraderie, the laughter around the dinner table, and the adventure of exploring a part of the world neither Bob nor I had ever seen before.

 

South Africa exceeded every expectation.

 

We arrived as visitors and left with memories that will stay with us for the rest of our lives.

 

Thank you to everyone who made this dream possible.

 

South Africa – we’ll be back.

One for the Road

The author with professional hunter Robin Hurt, a custom .257 Weatherby, and a Tanzanian impala in 1990.  Although well hit, the bullet slipped between the ribs in and out, and the impala disappeared in the long grass.  They got him in the end, but it was a long chase.  So much for Weatherby’s magic.

Underneath the Magic

 

By Terry Wieland

 

At a recent gathering, I was button-holed by a lady wanting some ballistic advice.  Seems she and her husband were having pig problems on their ranch in Texas, and his .223 was not putting them down the way he’d like.  What should he get instead?

 

Before I could utter a word, the lady then added that he had shoulder damage, so any kind of hard-kicking rifle was out.  And then, as I began to say something, she said “What about this new Creedmoor we’ve heard so much about?  You can shoot out to a thousand yards, with no kick at all.”

 

The 6.5 Creedmoor is undoubtedly a fine cartridge, but the laws of physics have not been repealed to accommodate it.  And while it has been around only 11 years, it is really not even that new; it is a cartridge that puts to use all the lessons learned since the first 6.5 appeared in the 1890s.  It does absolutely nothing that the 6.5×55 Swedish (born in 1894) would not do — and perhaps do a little better — if it had the same advantages in terms of throating, rifling twist, super-efficient bullets, modern powders, and a sprinkling of internet pixie dust.

To be blunt, the 6.5 Creedmoor has nothing magical about it.  Yet, magic is exactly what is being attributed to it.

 

In the past, the same thing has been claimed for other cartridges.  Some that spring to mind are the .303 Savage, .22 High Power, .280 Ross, .250-3000, and the .244 Holland & Holland.  The all-time champ in the blow-hard department is probably the .280 Halger, although some wildcatters have rivalled P.T. Barnum in their claims.

 

To give an example, one guy altered the shoulder angle on what was essentially a .300 Weatherby, and claimed an extra 200 feet per second, enhanced accuracy, and 10,000 psi lower pressures.  All from changing the shoulder angle?  I think not, thank you.

 

Also in the past, such claimants hoped to get the attention of someone like Jack O’Connor (Outdoor Life) or Warren Page (Field & Stream) to sing their praises in print.  Today, they post the hogwash on websites or phoney-up YouTube videos.  If nothing else, the internet has fostered the great age of the huckster, and today wildcat cartridges sprout, flower, and disappear as quickly as tulips in spring.

 

You will notice that, with few exceptions, the over-touted cartridges rarely make the list of true all-time greats.  Of those mentioned above, only the .280 Ross and the .250-3000 deserve to be on the list, which includes the .30-06, .270 Winchester, .416 Rigby, and — maybe the finest cartridge of all time, for Africa at least — the .375 H&H.

The 6.5 Creedmoor is a success because it applies all the lessons learned about mid-range 6.5s since they first appeared in the 1890s.

When you start analyzing the claims, you find that most are based on some naïve belief in the supernatural effects of high velocity.  This is almost always combined with light bullets and explosive performance, simply because you can’t get the highest velocities without using light bullets.

 

Go back and look at the true greats, like the .416 Rigby and .375 H&H, however, and you see that their genuine and enduring reputations were made partly on the basis of bullet weight, and partly on proper bullet construction.  The .375 H&H has based its performance on a 300-grain bullet of various configurations, while the .416 Rigby was loaded for many years with a steel-clad 410-grain bullet that delivered the ultimate in penetration.

 

Another example:  The 7×57, as used by elephant hunter W.D.M. Bell, was loaded with a 175-grain bullet that penetrated, and just kept on penetrating.  Same with the 6.5×54 Mannlicher-Schönauer, which established its reputation on four continents with 154- to 160-grain bullets.  They weren’t particularly fast, and it had a looping trajectory that demanded the hunter get closer than 300 yards, but put that bullet in the right place and you had your animal.

 

The 6.5×55 Swedish, a cartridge that I have hunted with, reloaded for, and admired since 1988, established a twin reputation over the course of a century as both a premier match cartridge, and a big-game cartridge.  The finest 300-metre target rifles, made in Europe, were always available in 6.5×55, while Scandinavian moose (European elk) hunters swore by it.  In both cases, these reputations were won, not with light bullets at high velocity, but by heavy-for-caliber bullets ranging from 140 to 160 grains.

 

At the annual Sportsman’s Show in Toronto in the late ’80s, I met a lady who held the record for the largest moose ever taken in Ontario.  Her rifle?  A cut-down army surplus Swedish Mauser, using Dominion 160-grain round-nosed bullets.  One shot was all it took, she told me.  She liked the 6.5×55 because it wasn’t loud, didn’t pound her, and it did the job.  Her moose-hunting husband used a .30-06.  She thought he was over-gunned.

Interestingly enough, Jack O’Connor’s wife, Eleanor, who was a top-notch shot and big-game hunter in her own right, almost always used a 7×57, and she said the same thing about the .30-06.  When she shot an elephant in Zambia, she decided the 7×57 was a little light (in spite of W.D.M. Bell) and used a .30-06.  She put the bullet in the right place, and down he went.

 

All of this is not to argue that the average elephant hunter should use a 7×57 (like Bell) or a .30-06 (like Mrs. O’Connor), nor that a Cape buffalo hunter should go out with a 6.5×54 M-S (like Werner von Alvensleben), only that it’s impossible to over-state the value of putting a good bullet in the right place.  There is nothing magic about it:  It’s purely a matter of good marksmanship, skill, and judgement.

 

Unfortunately, all too many hunters — lacking the aforementioned skill and judgement — prefer to substitute magic, and look for it in the claims of cartridge designers and bullet makers.

A heavy bullet at moderate velocities made Imperial 6.5×55 ammunition highly effective.  IVI-Imperial was the successor company to CIL-Dominion in Canada.

In the early 1950s, Roy Weatherby wrote some stuff (and got it published) making the most outlandish claims for his cartridges.  In one instance, he told of a long safari in Africa in which his .257 and .270 Weatherbys out-performed both a .375 H&H and a .470 Nitro Express.  A hit on an animal anywhere, he claimed — in the paunch, in the ham, it didn’t matter — and the animal went down.  Magic!

 

Well, I have used all of the above cartridges, and I admire them all, and I have hunted with all except the .470 NE, and guess what?  When I put the bullet in the right place, they work; when I don’t (and I have done it), they don’t.

 

In the years that followed, Weatherby cartridges gained a bad reputation, and by extension the users of Weatherby rifles and cartridges came to be regarded by African professional hunters as either ballistic babes in the wood, or wealthy guys who tried to substitute flashy rifles for old-fashioned skill.  When I took my .257 Weatherby to Africa in 1990, I was greeted with a few raised eyebrows.  I had my bad moments, but I also had my good ones.  I used the .257 (loaded with the old original 115-grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claws) and my .416 Weatherby (loaded with 400-grain Bear Claws) and both performed extremely well.  In both cases, it was as much a triumph for the bullets as it was for the rifles.  Neither one depended on extreme velocity, only on good bullet construction and proper placement thereof.

 

I would have done just as well — or just as badly — had I been carrying a .270 Winchester and a .416 Rigby.  One of my companions on that safari, which included both Tanzania and Botswana, was Finn Aagard, a former Kenya PH then living in Texas and writing for the NRA.  His rifle was a custom Mauser with interchangeable barrels, one a 6.5×55 and the other a .416 Taylor.  The Taylor, a wildcat little heard of now, was the .458 Winchester necked down.  Finn liked the rifle because it was efficient for its size, and didn’t kick much or deafen him any more than he already was.  Of course, he was a superb game shot.  That helped.

 

In the end, I wasn’t able to help the lady with the pig problem very much.  She knew just enough about rifles to object to every suggestion I made, but not enough to realize what the real difficulty was.  That, of course, is that there’s no magic to any of this, and no rifle combines supernatural killing power with no noise or recoil.  I asked what ammunition her husband was using, but she didn’t know.

 

I don’t hunt pigs with a .223 myself.  The .223 is not my idea of a good big-game cartridge regardless of what bullet you use.  However, I know several guys who do, and they generally get all the pigs they shoot at when they venture out.  They pay extra for good game loads.  They do not hunt with standard bargain-basement military ammunition, or light varmint bullets.  Their results come with good expanding bullets, generally a little heavier and a little slower, put in the right place.  From W.D.M. Bell to Eleanor O’Connor to my Ontario-moose-hunting acquaintance, it’s a formula that’s worked for more than a century, and the rules are not about to change now.

Same Goal, Different Paths

German Schützen rifle, circa 1912, built on a Martini action, in 8.15x46R.

By Terry Wieland

 

No one has pursued the goal of accuracy longer or with more determination than the Germans.  Ancient shooting societies, still existing today, not only pre-date Germany as a country, but also the discovery of America and even the widespread use of gunpowder.  They began with longbows in the 1300s, progressed to crossbows, then muskets, then rifles.

 

By the late 1800s, German Schützen clubs were developing match rifles and cartridges in parallel with those in the United States.  While the goals were roughly similar, the approaches were sometimes quite different.  Certainly, each knew what the other was doing.  American marksmen often travelled to Germany to shoot in their matches.  This allowed them to see what the Germans had, while German shooters could study the finest American rifles and cartridges.

German shooters are extremely serious, not just about accuracy, but about making their target rifles timeless works of art.  The name on the barrel, “G. Will, Zwickau,” is probably the retailer, not the actual maker.

In the 1890s, Germans and Americans had settled on remarkably similar cartridges for target shooting.  We had the .32-40, while in Germany there was a wholesale switch to a new target cartridge, standardized in 1909 as the 8.15x46R.  There the similarities ended.

 

American shooters developed methods of loading the .32-40 for best accuracy, including seating the bullet from the muzzle, or breech-seating it before inserting the case and powder.  Some, like Harry Pope, designed two-diameter bullets that required both breech-seating and special throating.  Virtually everyone loaded their ammunition on-site at matches, often loading and re-loading the same case.  Pope had one .32-40 case that was reportedly reloaded and shot 40,000 times during his career.

 

German shooters followed a similar ritual, but with the 8.15x46R developed a totally different approach.  First, the bullet.  Although outwardly similar to a standard .32-40 bullet, it had a belt about midway, flanked on both sides by lubrication grooves.  The bullet was pressed into the case until the belt contacted the case mouth.    The most famous of these designs was the #16H, and it was offered  by a number of bullet manufacturers.  Initially cast, they soon developed a double-swage technique followed by rollers to imprint the lubrication grooves.  These bullets were inexpensive, high quality, and readily available, and casting your own became rare.

 

The 8.15x46R was designed for smokeless or semi-smokeless (brown) powder.  Instead of taking a powder measure to the range, however, German powder makers developed, first, a means of pressing the powder into solid blocks that fit into the case; later, they sold powder in tiny bags made of nitrated paper.  Inserted intact, the paper was completely consumed by the combustion.  Easy and convenient.

The 8.15x46R cases were made with an interior neck diameter large enough to allow the bullet to be seated with just finger pressure, yet snug enough to hold it.  Instead of selling bullets already lubed, the shooter would smear grease into the grooves before seating the bullet with his fingers.  Because of the belt on the bullet, seating depth was exact and consistent.

 

The rifle chamber was reamed without a lip.  Obviously, any lip would have had to allow for the width of the bullet band.  Instead, they simply tapered the chamber like a forcing cone.  The belt on the bullet provided a good gas seal as well as gripping the rifling solidly, with no need of the “bump” provided by black-powder ignition.

 

One can look at this and suggest ways of improving it — ways to make the rifles more accurate and give the shooter a better chance of winning — but we have to keep other factors in mind.  Turn-of-the-century competitors travelled many miles to big matches, and did so by train, tram, or on foot.  Equipment weight was a consideration, as well as convenience.

 

German Schützen shooters were as serious and dedicated as any in the world, and the prizes and prestige were worth considerable effort.  Obviously, the methods they developed worked well.  The best American shooters, like W. Milton Farrow, went to Europe to compete, and did not dominate the field.  No one ever arranged a head-to-head match pitting Germans and their methods against Americans and theirs.  It would have been interesting to see who prevailed.

 

The 8.15x46R (right) was introduced in 1893, and its specifications standardized in 1909.  It became the predominant Schützen cartridge.  The bullet is the #16H pattern, as sold in swaged form by German bullet makers before 1914.  This bullet was cast in a Lyman gang-mould.  Note the belt.

The Last Dance

By Ken Moody

 

As the van carrying our clients arrived and parked, I joyfully moved forward, greeting our incoming hunters. I was particularly excited to meet Jake, who was bringing his double rifle for this buffalo safari. Jake and I had spent many phone calls prior, discussing ammo, rifle regulation, and all things buffalo hunting. He was an older gentleman who had hunted Africa a few times before, but this would be his first adventure with us and both he and I were looking forward to getting him afield with his .450/400 3” double. First out of the van, Jake stepped into the sunlight, bearing a huge smile. Upon seeing our staff performing their normal client greeting ritual, he joined right in, dancing and singing along as the trackers, skinners, and maids all burst out laughing at his attempts to replicate their rhythmic moves. It was quite a sight. When the dancing concluded, Jake made his way to each one of the greeters, shaking hands and introducing himself. It was obvious that he was happy to be back in Africa, and they all seemed genuinely touched by his earnest friendliness.

 

After moving Jake into his chalet and getting him settled in a bit, we took him to the range to check his rifle and make sure it was properly sighted. Looking at the antique, I queried Jake about its origin, age, etc. before getting him on the sticks to check out the old firestick. With a couple of adequate shots on the paper, we drove back to camp to talk about the hunt and what was expected in the upcoming days. Jake’s PH, Christoff, went over shot placement and the overall hunting plan and after a hardy supper, the rest of the evening was spent around the fire weaving stories of previous adventures with Black Death. All seemed well when Jake turned in for the night. The following morning Jake seemed excited to begin his quest, the hunting of not only one, but two Cape Buffalo bulls. Yes, the evening before he had confided in me his desire to try and bag two bulls on this one safari, a feat that could be a bit difficult to pull off. I told him to first concentrate on getting the first, and then we could ‘make a plan’ for a second. One needn’t put unnecessary pressure on themselves or one’s professional so the ‘one step at a time’ approach is best when it comes to buffalo. Jake agreed with the plan, and it was with much determination that he climbed aboard the cruiser to begin his hunt. That first day concluded with many buffalo sighted, but no shots fired.

 

Day two of the safari found Jake a bit weary and slow to move. I asked him how he’d slept, and he indicated that he had not slept well at all and that he couldn’t find his injectors for his insulin. A quick call to the guesthouse where he’d overnighted upon arrival, found that they hadn’t been left there, so we quickly went into town to try and locate some that would work with his medication while he went hunting. He hadn’t had his injections in about two days now, so we prioritized his needs. We all figured it was his lack of insulin plus jet lag and his age that were contributing to his sluggishness. Jake moved slowly but did manage to get into the cruiser ok, and I accompanied him and Christoff in case I was needed to backup on a wounded buffalo. Two hours later, my services were indeed needed as Jake shot a superb bull at about 40 yards, hitting the buff just a bit to the right of where it was intended. Fortunately for us, the bull dashed off into the thick bush, abandoning the herd he was protecting when hit. A lone wounded buffalo is much easier to track and find than one being pulled by the herd, so we were all grateful for that at least.

 

We listened intently for the death bellow and when it never occurred, I looked over at Christoff and we both silently acknowledged that this was going to be a long day. ‘Going to be a long one, Jake,’ I said to our clearly disappointed client. ‘Don’t worry, though, we’ll get him,’ I confidently continued. ‘I’ll do my best to go with you,’ he replied. Beginning the track, we covered about a half mile when we spotted the beast, lurking in a dense patch of thorns about 60 yards to our front. We began our move to get into position, but as we stepped closer, he bolted from the cover of the thorns and rushed out of sight, showing no signs of having earlier taken a direct hit with a 400-grain bullet. Now we all knew we had a job on our hands. Jake looked disappointed, and I reassured him that we’d give it our best and that he must remain positive.

 

We pressed onward, the minutes turning into hours and the yards turning to miles. About two hours into it, Jake began showing obvious signs of fatigue and finally had to be relieved from the track and taken back to camp. He had given all he had, but could no longer proceed. Once Jake was secure in the cruiser and on his way, we continued tracking the rest of the day until dark, only jumping our target once more before darkness called for an end to our day. We marked the spot, making plans to return in the morning to begin again.

 

Day three saw us back at it, the sluggish routine of snaking through the treacherous thornbush hampered by the snagging, pulling, and ripping of our clothes. Miles more we walked, our arms bleeding from the constant thorn abuse, until we again encountered the bull deep within the confines of this thorny fortress. ‘Woofing’ as he crashed away, I realized that we were going to have to walk hard on this track and press this bull until he finally decided to make a stand. We weren’t going to catch him unaware. He had to be made to stop, and only constant pressure from continuous pursuit would make that happen.

 

We broke for lunch on the track, and quickly choked down a sandwich each and quenched our parched throats with cool water from our bottles. Our trackers had this bull’s footprint imprinted in their heads, so I hoped it would only be a matter of time until we could sort this out. I wiped away the sweat from my forehead and signaled to Christoff that I was good to continue and once the trackers were again on the path, we marched away, picking up the pace and trying to press this buffalo into submission. Miles more we walked, a total of 13 of them, when we stopped and called the track for the day. We hadn’t caught up to the bull again but marked the spot and returned to camp, tomorrow being another day. Once back in camp we discussed the situation and with Jake wanting two buffalo, decided that I would continue with the wounded track with my tracker Robbie, and Christoff would continue hunting with Jake, on call to come assist me if needed.

 

Robbie and I spent the next few days sorting out the track and pushing it for up to 12 miles per day. Some days we would find the bull and some days we were just walking and trying to catch up. The old boy may have taken a bullet, but he wasn’t going to go easy. Finally, on the afternoon of day eight of the track and with 32 miles on my boots, we found where the bull had recently bedded, the evidence of ‘gut shot’ being everywhere. He was hurting now and could only walk a few hundred yards before having to bed again. My optimism for success grew, and I called in another of our professional hunters to assist as we closed in on what I hoped would be the final reckoning. With less than a half hour before darkness, we pressed  forward, everyone alert and on point. Three hundred yards later there he was, defiant and facing us, the dark body of the old warrior blending into the contrasting shadows of the fading rays of a sinking sun.

 

We moved a bit forward while the wounded buffalo remained motionless, staring a hole directly through me, it seemed. I circled to the right with Jannie, the backup PH, by my side. When we moved into shooting position, the target of our efforts spun 180 degrees and melted into the darkness. He had prolonged his agony a bit longer, and I felt badly for him in doing so. No one wanted to leave the suffering animal in the bush, but darkness prevailed, and we returned to camp, knowing that the next day would be THE day. But it was not to be.

 

While I slept in my chalet that night, I was abruptly awakened by the saddening sound of raindrops falling upon the roof. Directly, a full-blown storm erupted, wiping away any track or trace of our wounded bull. At first light, I jumped upon the wet cruiser, and we sloshed towards the last track we’d found the night before, only to find what I already knew. All spoor gone, washed away by the untimely storm. My heart sank. How the hunting gods could not have rewarded us for the time we spent and the efforts we exhibited was beyond me. I felt terrible for old Jake. He had managed to take another great buffalo while were searched for his first one, but this news would be hard on him.

 

I told Robbie that we would go into the block and check for any sign as I believed the buffalo may have died during the storm, given his state the last time we saw him, but hours of looking produced nothing. We left the block and then drove around it, looking for the track which would have indicated the buffalo had walked out of it after the rains, but every road was clean, devoid of any movement at all. If he had left the area, it would have been before the storm.

 

We returned to camp, and I broke the news to Jake, his eyes showing deep disappointment. Without a track, we could do very little other than drive the blocks and look for that specific track while concurrently flying the drone to see if we could locate the dead body of the buffalo. This we did for the time Jake was with us, but nothing positive was discovered. On the day of departure, Jake was in a bad state. He battled to walk and was displaying traits of exhaustion. I asked him if he’d like to go to the hospital, but he declined, stating that he was a doctor and felt good enough to travel. We contacted the airport to have a wheelchair waiting for him, gave him a hug, and sent him on his way. Two days later, we were contacted by his secretary, who told us that upon arriving back in the US, Jake was hospitalized for unknown complications.

 

A few days later, as I was driving the main road back to camp, I smelled the unmistakable odor that we as hunters all know. I gathered a search team from camp and, in about a half hour, found the old buffalo bull dead under a tree, just two hundred yards from the main road. He had died in a spot that we were sure to find. At the same time as we found the buffalo, my wife called me on the radio and told me that she had just received word that Jake had died that very day, a complication from terminal cancer being the culprit.

 

The elation of finding the buffalo for Jake was tempered with sadness at finding out about his death but I found it poetic that the two had expired basically together, hunter and prey, and that they likely joined again in the afterlife, the constant pursuit continuing into perpetuity. That’s as it should be, I believe, for a real buffalo hunter, and Jake was truly a real buffalo hunter. Until we meet again, my friend.

Bulletproof – 30 Years Hunting Cape Buffalo is a beautiful, full color, exciting read from Ken Moody. It contains good information regarding hunting cape buffalo and many adventure stories throughout its chapters.

 

“Thirty years of hunting ‘Black Death’ has provided me with many lessons and encounters and while I didn’t want to do an encyclopedia on the subject, I have created 136 pages of informative content that makes for an easy weekend read,” says Ken.

 

Purchase price is $25, which includes shipping to anywhere in the US. You can pay via Venmo at Ken Moody Safaris or PayPal @kenmoody111.  Please provide your shipping details with the order. If you’d prefer to send a check, send $25 to:
Ken Moody Safaris
POB 1510
Jamestown, TN 38556

Into The Thorns

Chapter Fifteen

 

Follow Up

 

I remember once reading something along these lines – “When following a wounded leopard, you have an 80% likelihood of getting mauled,” and, “When following a wounded lion, you have a 20% chance of a mauling”. And then the bad news, “If you’re mauled by a lion, the likelihood of death (yours) is a horrible 80%. If you’re mauled by a leopard, you’re only 20% likely to die”.

 

Sounds a bit like, “don’t worry about the Ebola virus too much, you’ll probably just die from malaria”.

 

But whoever came up with these percentages, in my opinion, did hit pertinent points. I cannot vouch for the accuracy of the percentages, but the idea seems sound. Wounded, or even unwounded, angry lions are very vocal. When they spot the hunter they will growl menacingly, or sometimes they will give an irritated grunt and make off. So the hunter has warning, and can at least prepare himself and face the right direction before the terrifying hell of a charging lion breaks from the grass.

 

A leopard, however, says nothing. He just lays there, crouched for the spring, and only once he is in the charge does he give vent to guttural grunts. The exception to this, I have found, is when hounds are involved. The leopard will be rumbling away like a huge engine all the time the dogs are near him, and great angry belches erupt from him when he attacks any hound which has ventured too close. But without the hounds, he is silent. Another factor which also raises the likelihood of being hurt by the leopard as opposed to the lion, is that he will only charge from very close range. He will try by all means to hide there undetected, or he will slip away at the first opportunity. But when he feels the game is up, or when he has been seen, he comes out of the bush like a snarling bolt of lightning.

 

Camouflage also plays an important part here. Lions are adept at camouflage; they have to be in their line of business. But leopards wrote the book on concealment. I have been amazed, many times, at the scantness of cover in which a leopard has hidden himself. Of course a large leopard weighs 150 pounds, while a large lion will weigh three times that, so it is much easier for the spotted one to worm himself into effective cover.

 

All these factors make it far more likely that wounded leopard will score against the hunters. And score they do. Without even racking the brain I can think of a dozen people I personally know who have had unfortunate encounters with wounded leopards, the most serious attack being the one on my brother at Shangani.

 

In the early nineties a startling story made the rounds in Bulawayo about a botched follow-up in the Gwaai River Valley where everything that could have gone wrong, went wrong. I read a well-written story on this particular incident not long ago, by Kevin Thomas, an excerpt of which follows, taken from Battle of the Gwayi edited from his book “Shadows of an African Twilight” and published in the African Hunter Magazine Volume 10 No.6, 2004. A very angry gut shot cat inflicted wounds on five people, and to make things worse, an inexperienced game scout let rip with a shotgun and bagged one of the follow-up team. Two different assaults had been mounted against this cat and he damned nearly won both of them.

 

Battle of the Gwayi

 

Professional Hunter Mike Bunce walked right past the wounded leopard 355 but his tracker, following, looked down to his right and ‘locked’ eyes with it. That is all that it takes. In a blur of snarling rage, the leopard launched itself at the tracker, and, downing him, bit deeply into his left upper bicep. It then raked its claws across his back before discarding him and springing up with lightning speed onto Bill Chatham’s bare head, where it did a ‘number’ on him with exposed hook-like talons. It then launched itself from Bill’s bald and bleeding dome onto the luckless Dave Chatham. By this time in a frenzied rage accompanied by loud growling and snarling it really worked Dave Chatham over, as they rolled around in the dust and leaves, locked in deadly combat. Dave’s clothes were soon in tatters and torn bits and pieces festooned the battleground. Under these circumstances there is little that one can do short of cleaving the leopard’s head with a panga, or trying to stick it with a spear or bash its head in with a kirrie. You most certainly cannot shoot it for the incredible speed of the encounter may well see the person getting mauled, being shot in error, or a bullet ‘driving’ through the animal  and killing the person.

 

After evacuating the wounded, Mike Bunce led a second follow up laterin the day and once more led the way in.

 

This time his intrepid band of hunters’ was made up of Thys de Vries, the PH son of well known safari operator ‘Buck’ de Vries, plus two Forestry Commission game scouts’ armed with l2 gauge shotguns loaded with number 4 shot shell. Young de Vries was carrying a NATO 7 .62mm FN military rifle. No sooner had the group of hunters arrived at the scene of the morning’s joust, than the leopard decided to carry the battle to them. It did so suddenly, without warning, attacking Mike Bunce with extreme aggression, before dislodging itself from his lacerated form and rushing Thys de Vries, who tried to bring his NATO 7.62mm FN into play. He got off one shot that was later reportedly found to have creased the leopard’s belly. Thys’ nightmare then became reality. His FN had a ‘stoppage’. An empty case was jammed in the  breech. This was all go for the leopard and it took but a fraction of a second to land on top of Thys bringing him to the ground. Thys then began to receive similar treatment from the leopard that the hospitalised Dave Chatham had.

 

This time around, however, there were two extremely nervous game scouts who had witnessed both PHs bite the dust within seconds of each other. It was just too much for one of them, because he knew that standing closest to Thys de Vries, who was by this time involved in a serious and very noisy joust on the ground with the leopard, he would be next on the leopard’s ‘Want List’. By his way of thinking, and as a true survivalist, it was time to do something so he did just that. He let rip with his shotgun at the rolling man and leopard locked in close combat at his feet. His timing was, however, slightly out and he jerked the trigger as Thys de Vries was on an upward roll and on top of the  leopard. Thys absorbed the fully ‘choked’ number 4 shot into his one buttock cheek. It brought tears to his eyes and cancelled out any pain that the leopard was meting out! Thys no doubt then began to holler in his home language to shoot the f”**ing leopard, not me! This had the desired effect and both game scouts brought their shotguns into play. It was all that Thys de Vries could do trying to keep a pissed-off and dying leopard between him and two game scouts who had gone berserk. Eventually, the leopard gave up, due to the weight of lead that it had absorbed, (both l 2ga and .458 Winchester, as well as the 30-06 soft nose from the night before). By then the leopard-lacerated PH Mike Bunce had come back into play and was able to put in a coup-degrace. All of the ‘players’ in this last scenario made it back and they too, were  casualty evacuated and joined their colleagues in Bulawayo’s Mater Dae Hospital. The hospital ward now held five lacerated casualties to one enraged leopard, a poor show all round.

 

All this, I think, makes the point that the wounded leopard is an extremely dangerous adversary and certain rules or procedures need to be taken when conducting the follow-up.

 

It is hard to believe, but when we look back over our records covering the years of specialist leopard hunting, a shocking 50% of cats presented to the hunter have been missed, wounded, or allowed to escape unshot at! This is from a double-sandbagged rest, at less than 110 yards, with at least a million candlepower spotlight! The two main reasons seem to be “buck fever” –  pure hand-shivering excitement and nerves, and the oldest, most common enemy of the rifleman, the jerked trigger, or flinch. A distant third is difficulty identifying the target. Hunters anticipate a golden, black-rosetted skin whilst they are sitting in the blind. But the reality is that the leopard, under the light,  usually looks a pale dusty grey colour, especially at a distance past 80 yardsor so, and this departure from what has been anticipated so acutely, can throw the hunter off for a crucial few seconds.

 

So much for the reasons resulting in lots of wounded leopards. For want of a better place to start, I think it makes sense to discuss firearms used in following wounded leopards.

 

Around the campfires of African big-game country, I think the most debated, discussed, beaten-to-death topic, way ahead of religion, politics and ladies, is firearms, bullets and ballistics. The beauty of this topic (for the gun enthusiast) is that like religion, politics and ladies, there is no clear-cut black  and white indisputable answer. They can argue happily all night long. It is open to personal preference, different terrains, different weather conditions and a host of other factors. All of which come into play deep into the fireside  arguments. Once again I can only write about our personal experiences and what works for us regarding the great firearm debate.

 

At the end of the Rhodesian war I commenced hunting for Major Don Price, and shortly after that I worked for one of Rhodesia’s pioneer safari operators, Fanie Pretorius, whose base was Matetsi Safari Area Unit 7, on  the Zambezi River, about 50 miles upstream from Victoria Falls. Fanie had been very badly mauled by a wounded lion and was convalescing when I went to help him. In fact, to my mind Fanie never really recovered from this severe mauling, even though he is a strong giant of a man. Fanie’s back-up weapon was a .460 Weatherby Magnum. When talking guns one day he told me about a client’s wounded bull elephant which was crossing the Westwood vlei, going like a bat-out-of-hell westwards, towards the teak forests of the Botswana border. The elephant was a good 200 meters away when Fanie brought him down with a well-placed 500 grain bullet to the hip. I never forgot this story, and I made up my mind there and then to try to get bold of a  .460 as soon as I was financially able. In those early days I was using a Sako.375 which had been given to me by a Danish client. This is a beautiful rifle which I still have today, 24 years later.

 

I do not class myself as a “gun nut” and could not argue effectively against any ballistics ‘fundi’, but one thing I do have, is plenty of experience seeing what bullets can do to big game animals. I have faced charging elephant, buffalo, lion and leopard, even a charging bushbuck and a wildebeest! I have read all about “hydrostatic shock”, “knock-down power”, “latent expansion”, and many other impressive sounding phrases describing bullet performance. But I have also seen an impala shot low in the shoulder with a .458. This impala had not read the chapter on knockdown power, and he ran off. He ran like hell for about three miles, leading us all a merry dance with his shattered leg wind-milling sickeningly. I have seen numerous animals shot with big rifles in the wrong place, and it is amazing how far African game can go on three legs, or with other horrendous wounds. As every hunter knows, the most important aspect of shooting a game animal, whether it is with a .22 Hornet or a .700 Nitro, is placing the bullet in the correct place. That is it. Number one priority! The second rule should be having the right tools for the right  job. The hunter obviously needs enough firepower to achieve the task he has set himself.

 

But the professional hunter’s responsibilities extend further than that of the pleasure hunter-sportsman. He must have the correct tool which can handle a huge variety of different circumstances. He will occasionally have to pull the trigger at a disappearing animal’s backside, or at just a fleeting glimpse of tawny skin through the scrub mopane. He will have to face 12 thousand pounds of screaming bull elephant and he will have to have confidence that his rifle will protect human life. He must be able to kill a large animal as far as he can shoot with reasonable accuracy, and he must be able to kill at point blank range. A lot of people will point out that there are numerous categories of firearms for numerous different tasks. That is true. But Murphy says that you will have the wrong rifle in your hand when the stool samples go into the fan. When you have been following Joe’s wounded leopard into the impenetrable Malalangwe bush at the base of the koppies with your trusty 12 gauge shotgun at the ready, Murphy will show you the huge cat, blood on his guts, looking back at you 85 yards away up in the rocks. You will look down at your shotgun and you will hate Murphy. And you will hate yourself. Penetrating an animal’s vitals with bullets is what kills an animal. Not knockdown, or hydrostatic shock, or any of these other by-products of shooting bullets into wild animals. So I made up my mind many years ago that I need to have a rifle which, above all else, I shoot well, under any and all circumstances. That rifle must be able to kill, easily, the largest land animal on earth, and it must also be able to do it from any angle. When you are following up wounded dangerous game you cannot wait for, or work towards, the perfect shot. You have to take the one which is offered. And more often than not it is a bad one. My .375, and later, a very short stint with a .458, showed me that they were not what I needed. Obviously they had their uses but they both had severe limitations too, the most glaring being lack of penetration on the big game – elephant and buffalo.

 

I finally got my hands on a brand new .460 Weatherby in 1985. In the last twenty years this rifle has saved my life more than once, the lives of at least three of my staff, and the lives of various clients. An incident occurred in the late l990s which turned out to be an eerie return to full circle. Some friends operating Inyathi Hunters on Unit 3 Matetsi safari area asked me to assist in a large group safari for elephant. The clients were Mexicans and they were all pleasant, fun people. I believe I had the most easy-going fellow of the  lot except for one quirk. This fellow under no circumstances, wanted me toback him up on his elephant. I am a long way removed from being a “double tap” man. In the early 1980s I worked for Dan Landrey of Denda Safaris and one of the things he taught me was, “It’s a perfect job you’ve done when you don’t have to fire a single shot the whole safari”. I’ve watched some of these big game videos that seemed to have tried their damndest to turn good old-fashioned African Safaris into something glitzy, American, and above all marketable, and in them the professional hunter shoots every single animal! It is puzzling to believe that the clients are so ecstatic on the films, having paid  all their money just so that the PH can enjoy a whole prolonged season of freebig game shooting and kill their trophy for them! Takes all kinds I guess.  Anyway, back to Javier, who did not want me to back him up. Unit 3, Matetsi, has as its western border, a cut-line separating Zimbabwe and Botswana. If any wounded game animal crosses that border, it cannot be followed. The dollars are paid and the show is over. I explained this to Javier, and told him that I generally do not fire ‘back-up’ shots, and that I prefer a hunter to kill his own game, but if we came across a trophy bull anywhere near the Botswana border, I should put an insurance round into the animal as well. He said “We see”.

 

Accompanying this safari was Rod Evans, a professional hunter from Bulawayo who was in the process of accumulating elephant experience in order to upgrade his full hunter’s licence. I was happy to have Rod along as he was pleasant company and a highly skilled man with his hands if it came to  firearm or vehicle repair. We glassed many, many elephant. Finally we found a group of 17 bulls, one of which was a beautiful symmetrically-shaped 55 to 60 pounder. We manoeuvred into position but the elephants started to sense something was amiss, and they began to move off. We finally got a chance at the bull we wanted. He was angling very slightly away, going from our right to left, at about 30 yards. Javier was carrying a .375, Rod a .450 Watts, and myself the Weatherby.

 

“I shoot, I shoot, – you don’t shoot!” says Javier.

 

“Okay, okay, go for the lungs Javier, right in the crease behind the shoulder,  first shot perfect, then give two more!”

 

The .375 cracked, the elephant sagged briefly, then a merry tinkle andclatter as Javier’s magazine floor plate opened and all his bullets fell on his boots.

 

“Shoot, shoot, okay! Shoot Wayne!” says Javier.

 

Both Rod and I let go at the bull, but he had now turned and we were firing  wildly at his stomach area as he merged with the others. After one shot we held fire. The 17 elephant bulls wheeled back to the right, heading for Botswana with our big bull at the back. They crashed through a shallow bushy dip, then up the other side. They were now in full flight and bent on the border. The big bull was a good 200 yards out, but I could see him for a split second, aimed at his right hip and squeezed off. At the boom of the rifle he sagged at the back, then disappeared into the dust. Rod and I both scorched Javier with ‘I told you so’ glares, and we went to check if there was a blood trail. The opportunity we had been offered for back-up was poor, but I knew that between us, we had some rounds in that bull. The follow up was unsuccessful. I guessed that Javier had put his first .375 shot too far right and too far back, into the guts of the poor animal. The little blood we found dried up within 500 yards. The next day we put a light aircraft up to look for the wounded animal to no avail. We walked, for several days, but came up empty handed, and the safari closed on a dull note.

 

Five days later, on a new safari, Rod was again accompanying the hunters when the group drove up to a water-hole, or pan, near the border. Inside the water was standing a big bull elephant whose tusks Rod recognised immediately as Javier’s! After a quick heated debate with the game-scout, Rod and the PH walked up to the elephant and dispatched him. He was literally on his last legs. His right hip was dishevelled and broken and the poor old boy was in dreadful condition. The knives came out as it was now ‘proof time’, and Rod had to convince everybody that this was indeed Javier’s elephant. They recovered my .460 bullet which had smashed the right hip joint and angled down into the back of the guts.

 

There followed prolonged petty vindictiveness by the department of wildlife authorities at the Matetsi Headquarters. These people said that since Javier’s safari was over, he could not claim the elephant, even though Rod had proved, with my bullet, that this was indeed the bull which Javier had wounded and paid for! I do not know how Inyathi Hunters resolved the issue, but Javier got his tusks. Thanks to the .460.

 

I understand that they weighed 60 and 62 pounds. It was with a wry smile that I thought about the incident 20 years before, not far away as the crow flies, that prompted me to look for a .460 Weatherby. How similar the two situations were.

 

The obvious problem with the .460 Weatherby, and other powerful magnum rifles is recoil. It is pointless owning a rifle you are scared of, and flinch from when firing. I have always advised young PHs that they should use the most powerful rifle that they can handle effectively. People have different tolerances of recoil. It should also be borne in mind that a good PH will probably only fire his big rifle in an emergency four or five times a year. Add to that three or four rounds fired checking the zero of the rifle, and it is not a lot of shooting. Secondly, when he does fire, he will usually be powered  with adrenaline and excitement, and will not notice recoil anyway. I have found that one of the biggest mistakes made by sportsmen hunters preparing for a safari is the over-use of bench shooting. Once a rifle is zeroed, I do not believe that any shots at all should be fired off the bench. Firing a big rifle from the bench drives the recoil straight into the collarbone area with the body unable to ‘roll with the punch’ as is the case when firing in the standing or sitting position. A hunter would be far better served aiming his empty rifle, or dry firing onto an empty case, several times a day inside his home, than he would be, blasting away from a shooting bench, developing a perfect flinch just in time for his safari.

 

As much as I swear by my .460 as a back-up weapon, I do not recommend any Weatherby calibres as a client’s hunting rifle. Too many hunters are sold on the ballistics of these powerful rifles, but most people cannot handle them without developing a flinching habit. They have a punishing recoil. One problem I had with the .460 when I first got it, was the murderous volume of noise flying sideways and backwards out of the built-in muzzle brake system. If you fired sitting down, dust would fly up ten feet either side of you, and your ears would not recover. I already had ear damage at an early age from my time spent in the war and the .460 made it worse very, very quickly. I took the rifle over to the US, and had the muzzle cut back to get rid of the muzzle brakes. It did help a little, but the damage was done. With ‘ear protection’ being about as common to the Rhodesian fire-force soldier as ‘tender feelings’, or ‘post-traumatic stress-disorder complaints’, it was inevitable that I would develop the constant maddening buzzing in my ears that sounded like cicada beetles inside my head. I have carried the .460 now for twenty years, so it feels like a natural extension when I am in the bush and as surprising as it may seem, it works very well on charging cats, both lion and leopard. One big advantage, besides being the rifle I am most familiar with, is that it can be fired accurately up to about 220 yards if you have a good set of open sights. I favour the conventionally-angled big game back sight in iron, and the tiniest iron bead that I can find, fitted at the front. This I paint white every couple of months. I tried the Williams big game sights made from an alloy, but they are not made for tough work. The adjusting screw strips the thread very easily, making them worthless. I know several other PHs who carry their ‘big gun’ when following wounded cats, and most of them do so for the following reasons. Firstly, that they are more familiar with their big rifle than any other, and secondly, that shotguns are for the birds.

 

Some hunters follow up wounded leopard with a shotgun. In 1986 a PH named Russell Labuschagne was working for me and he and I were guiding two Hawaiians for leopard, down on the Bubye River in the Lowveld. Russell and his hunter, Mike Iwaai, were sitting for a big female a couple of miles away from where I was sitting on the Bubye for a big male, with a hunter named Eugene Yap. At about 7pm we heard Mike’s rifle go off. He had his leopard, and she was a beauty – probably the heaviest female I have ever seen. Our leopard did not come in until close to midnight. Gene wounded the cat and we went back to camp which was a ramshackle fly-camp less than half a mile away. I do not remember why Peter Sebele, my tracker, was not on  this safari, but the end result was that Russell and I were doing the follow-up alone. As soon as it was light we picked up the blood trail which lead directly across the dry Bubye riverbed, into the thick reed beds, and then out the other

side.

 

Russell was carrying a double barrel side-by-side l2 gauge shotgun, and I  was armed with a semi-automatic 12 gauge with three rounds inside. We both had 00 Buckshot as ammunition. We found where the cat had lain down under some thick bushes about 500 yards from where Gene had wounded him. The blood was fresh. We had pushed him out of this thicket and back into the thick reedbeds. It was hellishly thick. In some places we had to push the gun ahead, then follow, wriggling on our bellies like snakes. The strain was fatiguing and we were taking turns in tracking, one guarding while the other was doing the tracking. Luckily we had reached some slightly more open reeds before we found the cat. Russell was tracking, and was about five yards ahead of me when the leopard roared and came from our right hand side from about 20 feet out. We both saw him coming through the reeds and commenced firing as soon as we saw him. In a rush of adrenaline both guns were suddenly silent. And empty. The cat was still thrashing and roaring in a fierce ball, biting himself, the reeds and the sand. Russell was standing about three feet from this raging beast with an empty gun and I yelled for him to pull back. We left the leopard still growling and carrying on and made our way out of the river to where the staff and clients were waiting. We grabbed Gene’s rifle and stalked carefully back into the reeds where we found the animal dead. It was a huge leopard and everyone was overjoyed at the outcome. It had been badly wounded in the liver and guts which accounted for him not making much mileage during the night. We took a lot of really spectacular photographs with both clients and their leopards in one picture.

 

Shortly after, we skinned the trophies and Russell called me over to look at the carcass of Gene’s cat. Three pellets, out of a total of 70 had actually penetrated far enough to finish this cat! It was quite amazing. We were fairly new to leopard hunting in those days and were of the generally held belief that leopards should be followed with a shotgun. That was the last time I ever did this. The remainder of the pellets had lodged in the flesh just under the kin. Granted, we were inexperienced and probably fired too early and too much. and we were shooting through some light reed cover, but I was not impressed. At fifteen to twenty feet I had expected to stop the cat in his tracks. We were lucky.

 

I read an article in 2004, published in the African Hunter magazine about following cats with shotguns, and the writer hit on a very succinct observation. The shotgun was made for bird-hunting – leave it in camp until its bird-hunting time! In this particular article the writer described a follow-up on a wounded lion, and one of the hunters was carrying a shotgun! After the lion was accounted for, with the help of some heavy rifles, they found that the shotgun pellets had barely penetrated the skin. The same as Russell and I discovered so long ago in the Bubye.

 

Somebody standing up for shotguns on cats would say this to me, “You recommend shooting a charging leopard at point blank range with your big rifle, but a shotgun, at point blank, will also stop a charging leopard!” This is correct, it would. My argument is that I shoot my .460 well in an emergency, I trust it, so there is no need to swap. Secondly, as mentioned previously, if you are carrying a shotgun, you will not be able to take the ‘long’ shot (60 to 120 yards) at an escaping cat. With my heavy rifle, I can.

 

Towards the end of the 2004 season I was at Graham’s ranch when George Parkin’s hunter wounded a big male leopard. George followed the blood trail the next morning as far as a huge dangerous labyrinth of rocks and caves. Quite rightly he returned to camp to seek help. He arranged for a houndsman, Theo Bronkhorst, to come out with his pack. I accompanied the group back to the caves but took a back seat with the client whilst George and Theo got on with it. It was only a few minutes before the rumbling growls rose to meet the baying hounds. Theo was armed with a revolver (I do not remember the calibre) and George with buckshot. They managed to get a view of the cat down in the crevasses and both George and Theo put several rounds into him. The pelt was very badly blown apart by the shotgun, but on close inspection not a single pellet had penetrated a vital organ!

 

I have heard several times – “don’t worry about ruining the head or the  skin on a wounded lion or leopard – the taxidermist can fix it – rather his skinthan yours!” I agree with this 100%. But looking at this skin I felt pretty bad. However, no one was hurt, and the client got his wounded cat, it was a good job all round. Except, once again, I saw the shotgun fail.

 

In summary of all this, regarding the ‘right’ weapon for leopard follow-up. I can only answer thus – a large calibre rifle that the hunter shoots best, loaded with soft nose bullets. No shotguns! One more small point on our follow-up armoury. When Sean was convalescing from his near-death mauling he said that had he been armed with a pistol as well as the shotgun he was carrying, he would have killed that leopard when it was on him. I thought about it for a while. Since that day, I carry my 9mm Glock, cocked, and jammed in my belt when following wounded leopard and lion. If I had a I0mm, I would carry it. It is further insurance, and it certainly makes me feel more prepared. We have been asked many times on many aspects of the follow-up, so I think the most sensible thing to do is to describe a typical scenario in the hills. That way I can stay away from the irritating do this, do that diatribe.

 

Ninety nine percent of the time our leopard is wounded at night. We wait for the vehicle and staff to arrive. Usually at least a good three quarters of an hour has passed before we are ready for the next step. Often, from watching how the cat fell, and from what the client has to say about his sight picture at the time of the shot, we will have some idea about what to expect. Once the jeep is with us we drive up to the bait shining the light very thoroughly all around the bait tree. Occasionally, if a leopard has been spined or brained, he will be laying right there. Beautiful. If not, then I have my No.2 tracker shine the light from the vehicle whist I go forward armed with my rifle and my pistol tucked into my belt. I like to move a few yards in a crouch, then quickly kneel in the firing position looking around over the sights of my rifle. This way I am down on the cat’s level and can see under any bushes nearby. Once we have established that the leopard is not right there, Peter joins me and we look carefully for blood in the bait tree or on the bait, and obviously on the ground. At this stage only the two of us are on the ground.

 

Usually you can tell if the leopard is hit as the shot is fired. You are only 90 to 120 yards away, so you can usually see the animal take the impact of the bullet. If he is hit solidly, through a shoulder bone, he will be knocked out of the tree, or if he is on the ground, he will be knocked sideways or down. He will normally issue a loud grunt or cough as he makes off. Quite often, a leopard will be temporarily paralysed in part of his body at the shot, and the rest of his body will be snarling and clawing around beneath the bait. But if a leopard is shot cleanly right through the lungs, he will leave the tree or bait area as if he is untouched. Many times we have found tiny amounts of blood at the bait, only to discover the cat is stone dead the following morning not even 100 yards away! Another way in which you can tell if a leopard is hard hit, is to listen carefully, immediately after the shot. If he is mortally struck he will be noisily bashing through the sticks and bushes and you can hear his getaway quite easily. But if he has been nicked or missed, he will disappear silently.

 

I have heard some hunters saying that it is better to follow a wounded cat at night with the spotlight, as the eyes will give the leopard away as he is watching you. This makes sense, and in certain areas of savannah or Miombo woodland I would probably try it. But the Matobo Hills, in my opinion, is the wrong place to fool around with wounded cats at night. There are so many rocks and crevices and holes which could conceal a cat, that the likelihood of having to receive stitches is great.

 

Usually by looking at the bait, or in the bait tree, Peter and I can tell where the leopard has been hit. Sometimes a bullet hole in the bait tree, or into trees or rocks behind the bait tree will indicate a possible miss whilst blood and meat, or bone or cut hair, will indicate a strike. Depending on what we find around the leopards’ getaway tracks, we will decide to follow or to leave it until the morning. Sometimes one of the staff will hear a gurgle or a sigh as the cat expires nearby, and in this case we will go after it. If thick gouts of  lung, or lung blood, or lots of dark arterial blood are evident, we will also go after the cat. I keep a small 12volt battery, usually a light car or motorcycle battery, which we use to follow leopard at night. We unhook the light from the big car battery and attach it securely to the smaller battery. We do not rely on crocodile clips to attach the spotlight wires to the battery. Murphy will remove them just when the first saplings go down in the charge. We wire them securely with baling wire and pliers. One of the staff, normally the number two tracker, will carry this battery while Peter shines the light. I am in front, Peter behind me and the third man behind him. We will start off kneeling at the first tracks or blood-sign. I will move back slightly, or to one side, so Peter can shine thoroughly into all cover. Once he has done that we will then put the light onto the blood sign and move forward. Peter shines the beam forward, and I move quickly, crouched, for about ten feet, then again I kneel down, rifle at the ready. Peter and No.3 follow.

 

We then start the whole process again. Look into cover, look down, find blood, note furthest blood, lift light, move forward. It is stressful work. Over many years Peter has had it drummed into him that if the leopard comes, he has to hold the light on the cat so that I can get a shot. Fortunately we have not had to face a charge in these tricky circumstances at night. When we are following a cat at night and the spoor leads further than we expect it to, or if it goes up into very thick cover or caves, we call it off and wait until the morning.

 

Nine times out of ten in our areas, when we find the leopard dead in the morning, he is unmolested. But in government concession areas, or wilderness areas there is a very strong probability that the leopard will have been damaged by something. Normally the culprit is hyena, but I have found clients’ leopards torn apart by lions and also eaten by other leopards! It’s a horrible night for a hunter when he has to try to sleep knowing that his ten thousand dollar cat is laying out there in the bush.

 

On a morning follow-up dawn finds us at the bait. If at all possible we try to have another professional hunter along as back-up. Many clients want to be on the follow-up, but it is just not practical. It is difficult enough trying to keep yourself and two or three trackers out of hospital. If you add the constant worry of the welfare of your client to the pie, things become a little too much.

 

I have heard of, and seen a few follow-ups that are more disorganised than the Haj. One big concern, on one of these ‘everyone do their own thing’ follow-ups, is the risk of someone getting shot. Everybody is on edge, and if people start popping up unannounced in all sorts of thickets and dense grass, there is going to be a tragedy. The follow-up has to be controlled.

 

If we have tracks or blood spoor, Peter bends low and follows them. I follow immediately behind him, rifle at the ready, safety off, and the barrel literally above his back. No one else is on the follow-up at this stage. Every  few steps we will squat down and watch the surrounding cover and pay attention to the activities of other wildlife.

 

About ten years ago I was hunting on Graham’s ranch with an Italian-American hunter who wounded a male leopard. A long hot boring follow-up ensued which took up most of the morning. There was just no blood at all. I was at the point of calling off the whole thing when Graham, who was assisting me, said he had found a single track leaving the area going under a cattle fence. We went to check it out and found a tiny drop of blood. Peter managed to follow for over half a mile where he found the cat’s lying-up spot amongst some thick bushes. Here there was only about a teaspoon-full of dried blood. The cat had probably licked his wound clean and left. Suddenly, further up in the hills, I heard a lone vervet monkey chattering away in agitation. I knew it was a warning call, and Graham and I ran up there as fast as we could. We saw the monkey squawking away in a pod mahogany in the middle of one of those small secluded basins or valleys we find up in the granite ranges. We moved carefully now with Graham walking around the left of the basin as we approached it, and I moved into a small outcrop of rocks in the centre near the mahogany tree. As I got there, the place simply reeked of leopard piss. Graham was out of sight, so with rifle at the ready I called for him. As I called, the leopard grunted about 25 yards to my front, and took off. I could not see him but l could see the leaves and grass marking his passage away from us. I yelled louder for Graham to backtrack around the basin back to where he had come from in the hope that he could cut it off.

 

Suddenly I saw the leopard leap into some rocks about 100 yards away, there was a gap about three feet wide between the boulders in the direction he was heading. I aimed at the spot and sure enough he sneaked into it. I touched off the .460 but saw nothing afterward. Graham joined me and we cautiously approached the boulders. There the cat lay with a big hole through his shoulders. We had the monkey to thank for that one.

 

Another incident, demonstrating how wildlife can give away the presence of a wounded cat occurred in 2005 in western Tanzania. I was hunting with Frank Zitz, a good friend of ours who is a top taxidermist from the East Coast. Frank wounded an old male leopard late in the evening. It was just before dark and Frank had difficulty making out what position the cat was feeding in. When we followed up the next morning there was very little blood and we battled to get started. After about two hours we finally found where something had lain down near some young Ilala palms. There was no blood, but on further examination we found tracks. The area was very grassy, and without blood, tracking was impossible.

 

I had been listening subconsciously to a flock of arrow-marked babblers for some time before it registered. They may have seen the leopard! These plain-coloured brown birds are inquisitive, noisy things and will often harass snakes and occasionally give unwelcome attention to hunters waiting in blinds. I told Frank to stay and cover the trackers who were still looking for tracks while I raced off towards the babblers. The birds saw me and took off. Immediately I heard an animal run through the low noisy palm fronds into a thicket of tall yellow grass surrounding an anthill. This must be him. I approached the anthill with my .460 at the fire position. I saw a clump of grass move about ten feet in front of me and I stopped. Nothing. I did not know whether I should fire, it did not seem a good idea as I was not I00% sure it was the leopard, or whether I should just wait, covering the spot. I waited but I was getting tired of waiting. Suddenly two small black and white batis (tiny birds) arrived over the grass and alighted on a spindly bush and began twittering like mad, glancing sideways all the while at the animal in the grass. I decided to take a shot and risk being left facing a charge whilst trying to reload. I aimed at where I was sure the animal was, and fired.

 

Immediately at the shot, the leopard commenced roaring and tearing up the grass and bush. Still I could not see him! Frank now came up and I motioned for him to climb up in a tree with his rifle. I did the same. Frank saw the leopard and dispatched him with two more shots. It was a beautiful old male with worn-down yellow teeth, and interestingly, a home-hammered musket ball under the skin of his right shoulder. Without the babblers I do not believe that we would have nailed this cat. We noticed that my shot into the grass had been a lucky one and had broken the cat’s pelvis.

 

Back to the follow-up. Peter and I will move in this fashion until we find the leopard, or until we lose the spoor. If, or when we lose the blood we mark the last blood with toilet paper and carry on with tracks, or what we think may be tracks. At this stage it is important not to fall into the trap of the gunman also looking for spoor. The man with the rifle must be looking about 10 to 15 feet out into the most likely cover expecting the charge every second. If there are no tracks or scuff marks showing, then basic tracking procedures follow. The tracker and PH assess the route the cat has used so far, and then try to gauge the most likely route that he must have taken. That route must now be checked a few feet further. If that route or pathway, produces nothing then the next most likely route must be checked, and so on. If the situation is ideal, and there is a back-up gun, then that person will be behind me covering one side and my focus would be mainly forward and on the other side. In this way we are covering the 180° that we have not walked through. If the follow-up still produces no blood, Peter and I will stand up and move out about 20 or 30 yards where we have not been walking around and sitting and leaving all sorts of sign. We will slowly cover a 180° arc in the direction the cat’s last tracks were heading.

 

A variation on this is for the back-up gun to take one tracker and take a left quadrant, and Peter and I to take the front right quadrant. When doing this, it is imperative to know where the other two are operating in order that we do not shoot each other. If a cat has been struck mortally, we would by now have sign of him again, or we would have found him. As a last resort, a couple of ever-widening 360° circles around the last confirmed spoor will generally produce something when following a well-struck cat.

 

There are so many variations of what a wounded cat can do, that it is not possible to describe them all here. In these Matobo Hills a cat which is very sick will not go far. There is plenty of cover and he will find a place in which he can hide and will lie there and die, or he will lie there and come at you when you find him. A cat which is not badly wounded will generally make his way up into the crevices and caves of the koppies. This is when serious problems arise. It does not matter how good you are, or how experienced you are, you are going to leave yourself exposed to leopard attack at some time on a prolonged follow-up. Most of the time you will walk through that exposed period – when your rifle is on your shoulder, or you are taking a leak, or you have to put your rifle down to pull yourself up onto a ledge, and nothing will happen. But it just needs that little slice of poor luck, that wrong roll of the dice, and that exposed period will happen right when you are next to the hate-filled bag of fury. It is simply not possible to fossick around the hills for seven hot hours and keep to the normal follow-up drills. Obviously the more time a crack team spends in an area without finding sign, the less likely it is that the leopard is still around. But you have to remember, Mr. Murphy is patient, and he has that horrible sense of humour.

 

Once all sign of the cat is lost, or when a cat gets into broken cave country, we ask the client if he wants us to try to organise some dogs to help find it. This can cost anywhere from $500 to $2500, depending on how long the dogs keep trying. Although – as can be seen from the chapter on hounds – I do not have much faith in hound hunting, they are definitely a big asset when looking for wounded leopards. They do not need blood-sign or footprints, and have boundless energy, and they can get into holes that we cannot, or do not want to. They are also very useful in attracting a leopard’s attention in thick cover whilst the hunters try to get a shot. We have used two professional houndsmen and their teams with varying degrees of success and we have also  used local tribesmen and their motley bands of curs, and their effectiveness was quite surprising.

 

If hounds are unavailable, it is up in the hills long after the blood-spoor has been lost, that I believe the hunters are at their most vulnerable. Down in the thick stuff near the bait everyone is fresh; everyone expects and is ready for a charge. But when the excitement has worn off, and the sun beats down, and everyone splits up and starts poking around listlessly in dark cracks and caves, Murphy will find the leopard. And he will make sure you walk right past him.

 

Whilst free-ranging the dogs, a large male leopard was surprised, chased by the dogs, and then wounded by Mark’s client. The very cavalier and not to mention naïve Mr Sparks spied the wounded cat inside a crevasse. Unarmed, he requested Mark’s old revolver, cocked it, and advanced casually toward the fracas as if he intended to do nothing more than dispense a few words of advice. The enraged leopard saw Mr Sparks and tore out of the cave as if propelled by powerful machinery. The furious leopard issued the by now extremely vocal Mr Sparks a severe mauling before being dispatched by Mark Butcher.

 

Into the Thorns is now available at Good Books in the Woods

www.goodbooksinthewoods.com

jay@goodbooksinthewoods.com

Face Up or Step Out!

This magnificent Bongo provided much-needed protein to the five Baka trackers’ families and a lifetime of memories to this proud hunter. 

By Ricardo Leone

 

Attention all hunters, PHs, guides, outfitters, and magazine editors – STOP posting and publishing photos with the hunter’s face blurred or blacked out! Basic logic says that if you are trying to hide, you must be guilty. If you are guilty, then the rest of us hunters are guilty by association. I am a proud hunter, and I personally reject the notion that I am guilty of anything. In fact, I am a proud conservationist who takes great pride in knowing the money I pay for my hunts pays for conservation.

 

In the US, where I live, hunters and anglers pay 75% of all conservation. Smart federal legislation like the Pittman Robertson Act, the Dingell-Johnson Act, the Federal and State hunting and waterfowl stamps, and license fees collect billions of dollars each year exclusively for conservation. This funding, combined with science-based methodologies for quota leads to optimal wildlife management.

 

In Africa, our dollars also support smart conservation. We all know what happens when hunting is closed and conservation dollars stop flowing. I recall back in 2012, when I hunted in the Lower Lupande, a world-renowned Game Management Area in Zambia’s South Luangwa Valley. The animals were plentiful, hunting helped provide jobs and protein to the local villages, and poaching was well controlled. In 2013, new elections led to hunting being closed for three years. I returned to the same hunting concession in 2016 when hunting reopened. The concession was almost unrecognizable. What struck me most was the elephants that were truly spooked by any human sightings. It was clear that most game was terrorized for the three years when the outfitters were sent home and no longer responsible for the safekeeping of the land. I retuned again in 2019, and the concession felt more normalized. Keeping hunting open matters – most of all to the wildlife.

 

I totally understand why some people would not want their picture in the public domain. There was a time when I worked for a public company when I would not share my picture in articles. Now that I am retired, I proudly share my picture. If you do not want people to see your picture, then step out of the picture. By blurring or blacking out your face, you are demonizing all hunters. If you want to preserve your hunting rights, then find a way to stand proud either in front of the camera or behind it. There are enough antis out there, and you are helping their cause by looking guilty. Either stand proud with your face up or step out of the picture – period.

This will close in 2 seconds