Dec 18, 2013 | News
A report produced by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network (TRAFFIC) indicate that approximately 45 elephants per day were illegally killed in 2011 in every two of five protected sites holding elephant populations in Africa.
The report said that this is due to the growing illegal trade in ivory, which continues to threaten the survival of elephants on the continent.The 17,000 elephants illegally killed in 2011 lived at sites monitored through the CITES-led Monitoring Illegal Killing of Elephants programme. The sites monitored hold approximately 40% of the total elephant population in Africa.
The joint report: Elephants in the Dust: The African Elephant Crisis warns that increasing poaching and loss of habitat, are threatening the survival of African elephant populations in Central Africa and in previously secure populations in West, Southern and Eastern Africa.
Dec 18, 2013 | News
Tanzania’s policy to maintain at least 32% of the country under protected forest cover has been lauded in the international media.
The Director of Environment in Vice President’s Office, Dr Julius Ningu, recently told the Science Journalists Association at Tanzania’s Commission for Science and Technology. He said that the policy had been put into place to counter changes in the frequency and severity of climate events, such as heat waves, droughts, floods and storms. He said that the intention of the policy was to ensure that climate change does not affect the country’s development efforts. Dr Ningu also claimed that Tanzania had good laws to protect the environment and environmental action plans at various levels.
Dec 18, 2013 | News
The management and staff of the AHI Bulletin and the African Hunting Gazette wish the entire international firearms and hunting industry a happy and prosperous festive season and great success on the 2014 expo circuit. We hope that 2014 will be an extremely successful season for all and that the world will be spared any tragedies caused by the mentally ill and then blamed on the existence of firearms. We also pray that poaching will be brought under increasing control and that wildlife management all around the world will increasingly improve.
Dec 6, 2013 | News
In the December edition of African Indaba, (a hunting newsletter) the author of one of the stories criticises The South African Professional Hunting Association (PHASA)for making ‘an about turn’ on its lion hunting policy. The author is a well-known hunter, and has been very vocal on his stance about hunting ethics. Yet he wrote how he justified shooting a buffalo from the vehicle and this was not wrong! A complete contradiction of the Rowland Ward Guild Membership Rules which he introduced, and within which specifically preclude this mode of hunting.
Embracing and adopting the lion hunting practice in South Africa is the boldest thing, in my opinion, that PHASA has done in the past decade. Here’s why:
Pressure on wild lions: There is limited research to indicate whether the harvesting of 600-plus lions in South Africa actually relieves the pressure on the hunted free-range lions around Africa. What is certain is that hunters who used to hunt, or have wanted to hunt lion outside South Africa, but have not got their trophy, or can’t afford to hunt anymore in countries like Zimbabwe or Tanzania, are turning to South Africa to hunt their lion. Why? At $100 000- plus for the chance of finding a lion, along with other complications like whether it is over six years in age (even though this method of testing is inconclusive), versus the security of knowing you will take your trophy for less than half that amount is a no-brainer for some hunters. This simple appeal for captive bred lions has to be good for the long-term plight of the wild lion.
Fair hunt: Most writers on the subject have not actually hunted one of these lions in South Africa, yet they are so quick to comment on how authentic or not the hunt is. Everyone is well versed on the captive breeding of superior trophy White Tails in the USA and the ever-growing practice with other species here in South Africa and Namibia – all in the quest to satisfy the inch-fanatic hunter.
Public perceptions: Try explaining the difference between a dead lion next to the big game hunter, be if from the free wilderness of Namibia or a captive-breed operation in Limpopo. The lion is dead and there is a delighted hunter next to the trophy, period. Where the lion originated is secondary to the fact that most members of the public cannot understand how we can hunt a lion. That is the hurdle we need to overcome!
Stop the squabble: What the industry’s now doing is focusing on how the chairs on the deck of the Titanic are placed instead of watching the iceberg on the horizon. Debating and engaging in internal battles about what is ethical or not, and which lions are fair game, instead of uniting and getting together to actually educate the world that there is a place for various types of lion hunting is where we are losing this window of opportunity:
Lions in my opinion can be:
- Captive bred and released on a 2500 acres or more (as per what PHASA has adopted).
- Bred on a game-fenced eco-tourism game reserve (one could argue this is, in fact, captivity) and then hunted there (which could be 25000 acres or more).
- Bred on a game-fenced reserve and then moved a 2500 acre property.
- Hunted on a state-owned free-range land
Time will tell whether this is the right decision that South Africa is adopting, but for now, it is legal, it helps promote hunting, and addresses a good number of needs within the industry. The countries that have free-range lions for now, great! But let’s stop the internal battles and work together.
Richard Lendrum – Publisher African Hunting Gazette
Nov 26, 2013 | News
According to an article by Antoinette Slabbert in Moneyweb, game ranching yields better returns than the JSE. The South African game industry’s annual turnover has grown from R62 million to R864 million over the last ten years, as measured by game and livestock marketer Vleissentraal’s auctions. Game farming gives a higher return per hectare than any other farming activity. The bulk of the revenue over the last ten years was from rare species (R788 million).
A total of 9,825 plains game and 1,751 rare game was sold last year. Taking into account the value of the offspring and production cost, it is estimated by a rare species game rancher that the annual return on capital employed can be 84.86% per year on nyala, 130% on black impala breeding with regular impala ewes. In comparison, last year the JSE All Share Index (ALSI) showed a total return with dividends reinvested of 26.68%. Game breeding also clearly outperforms investment in property, which has a typical return of 10%.
Demand seems to be driven by trophy hunting. Restrictions on hunting in countries like Botswana, Tanzania and Zambia have benefited the South African hunting industry, and the rest of Africa is perceived as dangerous.
The annual income from international hunters in 2010 was estimated at R557 million. This includes the hunter’s day fees (safari, accommodation, etc.), as well as the trophy fees for animals hunted. It excludes the value added by taxidermy, flights, sightseeing activities, rifle import permits, etc.
Nov 26, 2013 | News
Wildlife Ranching South Africa recently announced its own catarrhal fever insurance fund. It will enable game ranchers to ensure themselves against claims by cattle ranching neighbours for damage suffered if cattle attracts catarrhal fever from game. WRSA foresee that wildebeest will be one of the main resources. Game ranchers will pay a VAT inclusive premium of R 1,824.00 per annum and the cover for the first year will be R 1,000,000. Contact WRSA (http://www.wrsa.co.za) for more information.
